“…Despite previously proposed alternative hypotheses for the presence of primary soft-tissues in Mesozoic vertebrate fossils, such as contaminants or recent biofilms (Kaye et al, 2008), an abundance of biomolecular evidence has confirmed their initial interpretations as primary soft-tissues (Schweitzer et al, 2005(Schweitzer et al, , 2009(Schweitzer et al, , 2016Asara et al, 2007). Biochemical processes have been proposed to play a significant role in the preservation of soft osteological tissues; recently iron has been suggested as an alternative mechanism to explain the process by which primary soft-tissues can remain pliable over geologic time, by which iron from hemoglobin serves as a natural chelator to increase tissue immunoreactivity in vertebrate remains (Schweitzer et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2017). However, the presence of mineralized biofilms in vertebrate samples were osteological soft-tissues have also been recovered suggests a role in tissue preservation (Briggs, 2003;Peterson et al, 2010;Kremer et al, 2012;Raff et al, 2013Raff et al, , 2014Schweitzer et al, 2016), where biofilm crystallization in Haversian and Volkmann's canals seals natural vectors from further microbial penetration and retards subsequent metabolization of soft-tissues.…”