2012
DOI: 10.1177/0148607112449651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines

Abstract: A systematic review of the best available evidence to answer a series of questions regarding nutrition support of neonates at risk of NEC was undertaken and evaluated using concepts adopted from the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group. A consensus process was used to develop the clinical guideline recommendations prior to external and internal review and approval by the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: (1) When and how should feeds be started in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of interest, the accelerated feeding regimen as proposed by Maas et al [1] is in congruence with the latest guidelines on ‘Nutrition Support of Neonatal Patients at Risk for Necrotizing Enterocolitis’ by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) [2]. However, it is noteworthy that the authors of this guideline acknowledge that the proposed regimen of advancing enteral feeds by 30 ml/kg/day is based on weak evidence [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of interest, the accelerated feeding regimen as proposed by Maas et al [1] is in congruence with the latest guidelines on ‘Nutrition Support of Neonatal Patients at Risk for Necrotizing Enterocolitis’ by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) [2]. However, it is noteworthy that the authors of this guideline acknowledge that the proposed regimen of advancing enteral feeds by 30 ml/kg/day is based on weak evidence [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, it is noteworthy that the authors of this guideline acknowledge that the proposed regimen of advancing enteral feeds by 30 ml/kg/day is based on weak evidence [2]. While the median time interval until on full feeds in the study by Maas et al [1] seems very short for the accelerated enteral feeding regimen, a direct comparison with previous reports is difficult since no systematic analysis and data on this time interval have been published so far [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly, probiotics or nutritional approaches could shift microbial composition towards a more disease-resistant gut microbiome. A diet composed entirely of human milk has been effective in reducing the incidence of NEC in premature infants, and donor human milk supplementation has been recommended as one strategy to prevent NEC [38,39]. In addition to human milk supplementation, several probiotics have yielded success in the prevention of severe NEC and all-cause mortality in premature infants, including very-low-birth-weight infants [40,41].…”
Section: Microbiome Probiotics and Pediatric Gastroenterologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of evidence-based medicine has been widely accepted nowadays and it seems important that practitioners are aware of actual data to adapt their practice [10]. The exclusive use of human milk is associated with a significant reduction of the incidence of NEC and is the recommended source of nutrients for premature infants [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it seems important to define an optimal feeding policy that is correctly applied in each neonatal unit to avoid extrauterine growth restriction and to reduce the incidence of NEC [2,6,14]. Considering the risk of NEC in VLBW infants, the Clinical Guidelines of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition recently confirmed that human milk should be the preferred source of nutrients, minimal enteral feeding should be initiated within the first 2 days of life, and feeding advancement should be around 30 ml/kg/day for infants weighing ≥1,000 g [10]. Even if more studies are needed, it already seems clear that delaying the introduction of enteral feeds combined with slow advancement provides no advantages for VLBW infants and, indeed, may be deleterious by causing iatrogenic complications associated with intravenous support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%