2022
DOI: 10.1109/tnnls.2020.3040224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scalable Algorithm for Identifying Multiple-Sensor Faults Using Disentangled RNNs

Abstract: The problem of detecting and identifying sensor faults is critical for efficient, safe, regulatory-compliant and sustainable operations of modern systems. Their increasing complexity brings new challenges for the Sensor Fault Detection and Isolation (SFD-SFI) tasks. One of the key enablers for any SFD-SFI methods employed in modern complex sensor systems, is the so-called analytical redundancy, which is nothing but building an analytical model of the sensors observations (either derived from first principles o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A different rationale is pursued in [31], where a single Deep belief network (a Bayesian type of NNs) has been trained (in a supervised fashion) to detect a faulty condition whereas sensor identification is naively carried out based on the maximum deviation from data mean-value. Along the same lines, a general approach is presented to detect and identify sensor faults using either a single Recurrent NN (RNN) or an MLP [39] for predicting next-step measurements and comparing with actual ones. A disentanglement regularization term on the NN loss function is introduced to help the algorithm coping with propagation of faults to non-faulty sensors in the identification stage.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A different rationale is pursued in [31], where a single Deep belief network (a Bayesian type of NNs) has been trained (in a supervised fashion) to detect a faulty condition whereas sensor identification is naively carried out based on the maximum deviation from data mean-value. Along the same lines, a general approach is presented to detect and identify sensor faults using either a single Recurrent NN (RNN) or an MLP [39] for predicting next-step measurements and comparing with actual ones. A disentanglement regularization term on the NN loss function is introduced to help the algorithm coping with propagation of faults to non-faulty sensors in the identification stage.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, part of the literature evaluates corresponding proposals on private (e.g. [39], [40]) or simulated (e.g. [28], [36], [37]) measurement data, thus precluding reproducibility and convincing evaluation, respectively.…”
Section: B Paper Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data-driven SFDIA approaches have gained attention due to their ability to handle complex systems without the need for exact knowledge of the underlying model. Popular approaches build upon principal component analysis [12], support vector machine [13] and neural network (NN) based methods [14]- [17]. A modular SFDIA (M-SFDIA) scheme has been recently proposed in [18], [19] based on multi-layer perceptron (MLP) blocks connected in three layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al (2020) proposed a CNN-based FDD method for micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) inertial sensors, in which the time-domain features of temperature-related sensor faults were adopted to train the data-driven FDD classifier. Haldimann et al (2020) proposed a disentangled RNN and residual analysis-based SFDD method and developed a novel procedure to identify the fault sensors. Chen et al (2021b) proposed an NN-based fault estimation method, which can obtain the accurate estimation of sensor faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%