2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/socialcom.2010.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scalable Framework for Modeling Competitive Diffusion in Social Networks

Abstract: Multiple phenomena often diffuse through a social network, sometimes in competition with one another. Product adoption and political elections are two examples where network diffusion is inherently competitive in nature. For example, individuals may choose to only select one product from a set of competing products (i.e. most people will need only one cell-phone provider) or can only vote for one person in a slate of political candidate (in most electoral systems). We introduce the weighted generalized annotat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work differs from the work of [19] in several ways. First, our study deals only with the spread of knowledge, as opposed to the spread of opinion, which as defined could depend on several bits of knowledge (or equivalently, pieces of knowledge) [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our work differs from the work of [19] in several ways. First, our study deals only with the spread of knowledge, as opposed to the spread of opinion, which as defined could depend on several bits of knowledge (or equivalently, pieces of knowledge) [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Consequently, questions focusing on the diffusion of conflicting knowledge in a network are rarely addressed. A notable exception is the work of [19], who describes a tool which allows users to specify conflicting opinions within a social network. The tool then predicts the most likely outcome of a scenario where agents must choose to side with one or more of these opinions (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we are interested in understanding how the way in which agents make decisions affects the flow of information, as opposed to considering what opinion is most likely to be held by the majority of agents. Finally, we use simulation to generate results, whereas [19] treat the issue as an optimization problem. Consequently, our focus is much more heavily tied to understanding the flow of information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals receive information in a continuous stream over time, merging small pieces of information at different spatial locations and then conveying them to the masses over OSNs. Several mathematical models have been proposed to model the distribution of information in OSNs, but none of them is comprehensive [17]. The heterogeneity of user interactions and mobility concerning links, the dynamic structure of OSNs, and the merging of information over time and space have opened a new era of research on information diffusion and user behaviors in OSNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%