2022
DOI: 10.1007/s41252-022-00249-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scoping Review of the Healthcare and Hygiene Literature for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Abstract: Objectives Previous reviews highlight the similarities in teaching healthcare and hygiene routines to individuals with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities. Additionally, similar interventions are used when interfering behaviors occur. Although these routines are topographically distinct, there are enough similarities to suggest effective procedures for one routine may be used to inform another. This scooping review aims to identify effective teaching and intervention procedures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intervenções comportamentais demonstram-se úteis no aumento da adesão em rotinas essenciais de higiene e saúde (Jennings et al, 2022). Diversas variáveis podem afetar a confiabilidade dos resultados deste relato.…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified
“…Intervenções comportamentais demonstram-se úteis no aumento da adesão em rotinas essenciais de higiene e saúde (Jennings et al, 2022). Diversas variáveis podem afetar a confiabilidade dos resultados deste relato.…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified
“…Individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities may also engage in challenging behaviors which could also serve as a contributing factor to incomplete or failed medical procedures and future avoidance of them (Jennings et al, 2022). The prevalence of challenging behavior ranges from 48 to 60% in school-age children with intellectual or developmental disabilities and up to 90% for school-age children with ASD (Simó-Pinatella et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%