2021
DOI: 10.1177/02646196211029344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scoping review of vision rehabilitation services in Canada

Abstract: Around 1.5 million Canadians live with some form of vision impairment. The demand for vision rehabilitation (VR) services is projected to increase as the number of older adults with age-related vision loss rises. To inform programmes and policies for VR, we aimed to answer two research questions: (1) How are VR services delivered in Canada? and (2) If gaps exist in current delivery of VR services, how can they be characterized? We used Arksey and O’Malley scoping review framework. A comprehensive search of fiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The barriers and enablers of LVR service utilization have been well documented in the Western world, such as the United States, 11 Australia, 12 and Canada, 13,14 and in some Asian countries, such as India 15,16 and Pakistan. 17 In ESEA, however, evidence of the barriers and enablers of LVR service utilization is fragmented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barriers and enablers of LVR service utilization have been well documented in the Western world, such as the United States, 11 Australia, 12 and Canada, 13,14 and in some Asian countries, such as India 15,16 and Pakistan. 17 In ESEA, however, evidence of the barriers and enablers of LVR service utilization is fragmented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of survivor and provider respondents, as in other jurisdictions, called for provincial action to address gaps in poststroke VI care. [11][12][13][14] In the UK, unmet needs for poststroke VI were attributed to absent treatment protocols (9%), limited use of screening tools to detect post-stroke VI (22%), and inadequate educational material available for patients or caregivers (33.5%). 13 Rowe et al then co-designed a stroke-VI care pathway using a literature review and two focus groups with care providers and survivors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%