2017
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scoring System to Predict the Development of Bone Metastasis After Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: This new score can help clinicians identify patients at risk for continuous monitoring and optimize surveillance to be able to detect and treat bone metastases very early in order to avoid skeletal complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, patients with lung metastases and high CEA should be monitored for BM especially for CEA values exceeding >100 μg/L. Our results (showed in Table 3 )were similar to the literature reported by Li A, et al [19] . They found three independent risk factors, namely rectal cancer, lymph node metastasis (LN) and pulmonary metastasis (PM) for developing a scoring system to predict bone metastasis after radical resection within 5 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, patients with lung metastases and high CEA should be monitored for BM especially for CEA values exceeding >100 μg/L. Our results (showed in Table 3 )were similar to the literature reported by Li A, et al [19] . They found three independent risk factors, namely rectal cancer, lymph node metastasis (LN) and pulmonary metastasis (PM) for developing a scoring system to predict bone metastasis after radical resection within 5 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In previous studies, the tumor location was detected to be an independent risk factor for predicting BM in CRC. [ 4 , 17 ] But this result was not confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Six studies included unselected cohorts of patients with CRC [12], [15], [33], [34]. The remaining studies included various cohorts of patients, for example cohorts only including patients with mCRC, CRC patients who underwent surgery, patients with adenocarcinoma or only rectal cancer patients [16], [32], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]. Furthermore, most studies did not report the exact follow-up period and those that did had different follow-up periods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRCNo. BMIncidence of BM (%)95% CI (%)Survival after BM diagnosisFollow up Retrospective studies All cases diagnosed with CRCSantini et al2012Italy [12]1985-2009All cases with CRC>2500264∼109.4 - 11.8Median 7 monthsNR – all dead at last follow upPortales et al2015France [13]1996-2006All cases with CRC24341104.53.7 – 5.4Median 9.4 months-Bonnheim et al1986USA [14]1970-1980All cases with CRC1406664.73.6 - 5.9Median 7 months-Zhenghong et al 2017China [15]2006-2015All cases with CRC20661024.94.0 – 6.0--Selected patients with CRCLi et al 2017China [16]Underwent radical surgery. T any N any M 0 1749502.92.2 - 3.8-5 yearsBaek et al2016South Korea [17]2007-2013Underwent surgery(including surgery for stage 4)5479631.20.9 - 1.5Median: 17.8Mean 19.6 monthsLan et al 2015 Taiwan [18]2000-2010Underwent surgery (including surgery for stage 4)149220a1.30.9 - 0.21-Median 69.7 monthsSun et al2015China [19]2004-2009Underwent radical surgery (including surgery for stage 4)AdenocarcinomaNo BM at primary surgery516316.04.1 - 8.4-Median 69.5 monthsJimi et al2013Japan [20]1993-2008Underwent surgery(including surgery for stage 4)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%