2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01350.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Small Peptide Sequence is Sufficient for Initiating Kinesin‐1 Activation Through Part of TPR Region of KLC1

Abstract: Kinesin-1 anterogradely transports vesicles containing cargo proteins when a protein-protein interaction activates it from an inhibited state. The C-terminal cytoplasmic region of kinesin-1 cargo protein Alcadeinα (Alcα) interacts with the KLC1 subunit's tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) region, activating kinesin-1's association with vesicles and anterograde transport. We found that either of two 10-amino-acid WD motifs in Alcα cytoplasmic region was necessary and sufficient to initiate this activation. An artif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
82
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
12
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, most KIF5B labeled dysferlin-containing vesicles did not show long-range processive movement and are limited to local movements in resting L6 myotubes. These findings are consistent with reports describing processive and non-processive movements of kinesin-bound cargoes (36,37). Possible explanations for the non-processive behavior of a subpopulation of kinesin-containing dysferlin vesicles are that KIF5B may be bound to dysferlin-containing vesicles without sufficiently activating kinesin motor activity or without actively engaging microtubules (36) or perhaps the clustering of vesicles limits their motility or anchors them to another subcellular structure.…”
Section: Dysferlin-containing Vesicles Move Along Microtubules Via Kisupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Interestingly, most KIF5B labeled dysferlin-containing vesicles did not show long-range processive movement and are limited to local movements in resting L6 myotubes. These findings are consistent with reports describing processive and non-processive movements of kinesin-bound cargoes (36,37). Possible explanations for the non-processive behavior of a subpopulation of kinesin-containing dysferlin vesicles are that KIF5B may be bound to dysferlin-containing vesicles without sufficiently activating kinesin motor activity or without actively engaging microtubules (36) or perhaps the clustering of vesicles limits their motility or anchors them to another subcellular structure.…”
Section: Dysferlin-containing Vesicles Move Along Microtubules Via Kisupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For transfection of cells, cDNAs coding for full length non-mutated hNCAM180 (Diestel et al, 2004); hNCAMΔCT (Boutin et al, 2009);rat NCAM140-ID (Leshchyns'ka et al, 2003); rat NCAM-ID-729-750, rat NCAM-ID-777-810, and Sec8Y401F,Y616F (Chernyshova et al, 2011); rat NCAM-ID-748-777 (Li et al, 2013); GFP-KLC1 and GFP-KHC1 (generous gifts of Toshiharu Suzuki, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan) (Araki et al, 2007;Kawano et al, 2012), and GFP (Clontech) were used. To construct cDNA coding for hNCAM180-Δ747-754, site-specific mutagenesis was carried out using the overlap extension PCR method (Ho et al, 1989) with hNCAM180 as a template.…”
Section: Dna Constructs and Sirnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved via an intramolecular interaction in which the C-terminal isoleucine-alanine-lysine (IAK) motif (and flanking amino acids) of a single KHC tail binds at the N-terminal motor dimer interface and participates in a "double-lockdown" mechanism whereby it cross-links the motor domains preventing movement of the neck linker region that is required for ADP release (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). In the cargo-bound active state, tail-mediated inhibition is relieved resulting in a more elongated structure that is able to hydrolyze ATP and translocate along MTs (12)(13)(14)(15)(16). As well as binding to cargoes, the KLCs are thought to regulate KHC autoinhibition, although the molecular mechanism(s) that couple these two functions are unclear (17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%