1992
DOI: 10.1002/pdi.1960090203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A screening programme for diabetic retinopathy

Abstract: Retinal photography using a non‐mydriatic fundus camera has been proposed as a means of screening for diabetic retinopathy. We describe a screening programme which uses this technique and is run by liaison between a Diabetic Day Unit and Ophthalmology Department within a District General Hospital. A 10‐month period of screening is reported during which time 639 patients were photographed. Of these, 110 patients (17.2%) were referred for clinical eye examination of which 100 attended (15.6%), 27 patients (4.2%)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Retinal photographs were taken using a Canon CR3 45NM non‐mydriatic fundus camera, and assessed for degree of retinopathy by a single ophthalmologist, experienced in diabetic retinopathy. Retinopathy was graded as 0–3 as follows: 0, no retinopathy; 1, mild background retinopathy; 2, severe background retinopathy (blots and several hard exudates) or maculopathy or preproliferative retinopathy; 3, proliferative retinopathy [13]. Retinal photography and grading of results was carried out prior to forearm blood‐flow studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retinal photographs were taken using a Canon CR3 45NM non‐mydriatic fundus camera, and assessed for degree of retinopathy by a single ophthalmologist, experienced in diabetic retinopathy. Retinopathy was graded as 0–3 as follows: 0, no retinopathy; 1, mild background retinopathy; 2, severe background retinopathy (blots and several hard exudates) or maculopathy or preproliferative retinopathy; 3, proliferative retinopathy [13]. Retinal photography and grading of results was carried out prior to forearm blood‐flow studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%