1970
DOI: 10.1080/00221589.1970.11514341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A seasonal pattern of apple root growth in Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found for citrus (Citrus sinensis) (Bevington and Castle, 1985) and for red pine (Pinus resinosa) seedlings (Drew, 1982). Conversely, apple (Malus domestica) trees were found to have concurrent root and shoot growth flushes (Cripps, 1970). Some tropical fruits have continuous root growth, despite periodic shoot growth (Marler and Willis, 1996;Willis and Marler, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Similar results were found for citrus (Citrus sinensis) (Bevington and Castle, 1985) and for red pine (Pinus resinosa) seedlings (Drew, 1982). Conversely, apple (Malus domestica) trees were found to have concurrent root and shoot growth flushes (Cripps, 1970). Some tropical fruits have continuous root growth, despite periodic shoot growth (Marler and Willis, 1996;Willis and Marler, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…growth in situ. Research before the development of minirhizotrons suggested that apple root growth peaked before and after the main phase of shoot growth in early to midsummer (Cripps, 1970;Head, 1967). These seasonal patterns were affected by pruning (Rogers and Head, 1969) and rootstock genotype (Rogers, 1939), and presumably would vary across different climatic regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e.g., transplanting) when soil temperatures were not limiting (Cripps, 1970;Wang et al, 1995). Species more prone to desiccation may not be able to take advantage of the favorable soil temperatures when transplanted in summer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences among the values of the non-transplanted treatments relative to the transplanted treatments and each other reflect the relatively sparse root production by trees in the non-transplanted field treatment as well as the high root production of trees in the nontransplanted PIP treatment. The greater activity of the transplanted trees relative to the non-transplanted field trees likely represents the stimulation of anomalous root growth resulting from transplanting (Cripps, 1970;Watson and Himelick, 1982).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%