2012
DOI: 10.1137/11085548x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Second Order in Time Modified Lagrange--Galerkin Finite Element Method for the Incompressible Navier--Stokes Equations

Abstract: Abstract. We introduce a second order in time modified Lagrange-Galerkin (MLG) method for the time dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. The main ingredient of the new method is the scheme proposed to calculate in a more efficient manner the Galerkin projection of the functions transported along the characteristic curves of the transport operator. We present error estimates for velocity and pressure in the framework of mixed finite elements when either the mini-element or the P 2/P 1 Taylor-Hood el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Süli [27] develops a methodology based on mathematical induction on the index n to calculate the error estimates for LG-BDF1 methods, such an approach can be extended to the calculation of the error estimates for LG-BDF2 methods as well, see [5]. Recalling that m and m 1 are the degree of the polynomials of X h and M h respectively, one proves the error estimates by making the following assumptions:…”
Section: Error Bounds For Lg-bdf1 and Lg-bdf2 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Süli [27] develops a methodology based on mathematical induction on the index n to calculate the error estimates for LG-BDF1 methods, such an approach can be extended to the calculation of the error estimates for LG-BDF2 methods as well, see [5]. Recalling that m and m 1 are the degree of the polynomials of X h and M h respectively, one proves the error estimates by making the following assumptions:…”
Section: Error Bounds For Lg-bdf1 and Lg-bdf2 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of points inside the elements of a mesh is a trivial task in structured meshes, for instance, in meshes composed of squares or hexahedra, but if the mesh is unstructured the location of points is not that simple; hence, LG methods may become less efficient than they look at first. To partially overcome these drawbacks, some variations of conventional LG method, such as the area-weighting method for quadrilateral structured meshes [20], exact integration [22] for straight side triangular meshes with linear elements, and the modified LG methods [5,6], have been proposed. We do not consider such variations in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma The Galerkin projection ( R h , Q h ) satisfies RhLC(boldu2+p1), RhLC(bolduW1,+pL). …”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a large number of works concentrated on the numerical solutions of Navier-Stokes equations. We refer the readers to monographs [1,2] for the theoretical and numerical analysis, [3][4][5][6] for finite difference methods, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] for FEMs, [25][26][27] for characteristics FEMs, [28,29] for discontinuous Galerkin method. More precisely, ax fast finite difference method was proposed in [4] based on the vorticity streamfunction formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%