2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A seepage face model for the interaction of shallow water tables with the ground surface: Application of the obstacle-type method

Abstract: International audienceThis paper presents a model to simulate overland flow genesis induced by shallow water table movements in hillslopes. Variably saturated subsurface flows are governed by the Richards equation discretized by continuous finite elements on unstructured meshes. An obstacle-type formulation is used to determine where saturation conditions, and thus seepage face conditions, are met at the ground surface. The impact of hillslope geometry, boundary conditions, and soil hydraulic parameters on mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual problem is to find the extent of the seepage face on γ S (t), since its boundary is a free boundary and part of the solution that has to be determined, often within an iterative process (cf. [8]), e.g., by switching between Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions [17]. With regard to this problem, our approach turns out to be quite elegant and appropriate, because the boundary conditions (2.13) constitute just another obstacle in the convex minimization problem that we obtain in Section 3.…”
Section: Kirchhoff Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual problem is to find the extent of the seepage face on γ S (t), since its boundary is a free boundary and part of the solution that has to be determined, often within an iterative process (cf. [8]), e.g., by switching between Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions [17]. With regard to this problem, our approach turns out to be quite elegant and appropriate, because the boundary conditions (2.13) constitute just another obstacle in the convex minimization problem that we obtain in Section 3.…”
Section: Kirchhoff Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we observe that in contrast to front tracking schemes, Algorithm 2 does not use any information from the previous time step to determine the wet portion of the interface. This offers the advantage of robustness and ease of extension to 3D/2D settings, but can entail higher computational costs than those incurred by front tracking schemes in the absence of exfiltration (see for instance [7]). …”
Section: Admissibility Of (ψ H)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the hydraulic head of the subsurface flow matches the depth of the overland flow at the interface, while the normal ground flow velocity is used as a source term in the governing equation of the overland flow. Examples of studies based on this approach include coupling one-dimensional surface flow with vertical soil columns [30], coupling the two-dimensional Richards' equation with a one-dimensional kinematic or diffusive wave approximation for the overland flow [22,7], and coupling the two-dimensional Darcy's equation with one-dimensional shallow-water equations [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Beaugendre et al . [] simulated water exfiltration at the ground surface with a coupled surface/subsurface model and compared the results with those obtained by using a simpler subsurface seepage face model. They show how, for simple scenarios involving constant slope and rainfall, the two approaches yield similar results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%