2015
DOI: 10.1504/ijbfmi.2015.075358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-adaptive fuzzy-based optimised functional link artificial neural network model for financial time series prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 provides a descriptive summary of the data scaling, feature selection, and hybrid model categories identified in the sample of articles each year, with responses indicated as either “yes” or “no.” The use of preprocessing techniques is quite common, particularly for neural networks (Qi, 2002; Tseng et al, 2012), and there are numerous ways to do so. The most widely used techniques include normalization using min‐max (Bhowmick et al, 2019; Das & Padhy, 2018; Das et al, 2015; Hajibabaei et al, 2014; Hegde et al, 2018; Shrivastava & Panigrahi, 2011) or normal distribution approximation (Van Gestel et al, 2006; Yazdani‐Chamzini et al, 2012), also referred to as standardization (McNally et al, 2018), as well as softmax function (Jiang et al, 2018), log‐transform (Gradojevic & Yang, 2006; Kumar, 2010; Kumar & Thenmozhi, 2012; Matyjaszek et al, 2019), differences (Cao & Tay, 2001; Gradojevic & Yang, 2006), and those articles that do not specify any data transformation. Among these, min‐max normalization is the most prevalent in the articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 provides a descriptive summary of the data scaling, feature selection, and hybrid model categories identified in the sample of articles each year, with responses indicated as either “yes” or “no.” The use of preprocessing techniques is quite common, particularly for neural networks (Qi, 2002; Tseng et al, 2012), and there are numerous ways to do so. The most widely used techniques include normalization using min‐max (Bhowmick et al, 2019; Das & Padhy, 2018; Das et al, 2015; Hajibabaei et al, 2014; Hegde et al, 2018; Shrivastava & Panigrahi, 2011) or normal distribution approximation (Van Gestel et al, 2006; Yazdani‐Chamzini et al, 2012), also referred to as standardization (McNally et al, 2018), as well as softmax function (Jiang et al, 2018), log‐transform (Gradojevic & Yang, 2006; Kumar, 2010; Kumar & Thenmozhi, 2012; Matyjaszek et al, 2019), differences (Cao & Tay, 2001; Gradojevic & Yang, 2006), and those articles that do not specify any data transformation. Among these, min‐max normalization is the most prevalent in the articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the above models can be used for time series data prediction. Das et al gave forward a FLANN model trained by fuzzy for prediction of the closing price of Yahoo Inc, Nokia and Bank of America [31]. The result is then put in comparison to the constraints of the FLANN model trained by GA. A trigonometric FLANN model projected by Majhi et al for short term and long term prediction [32] of prices of S&P 500 and DJIA stock price.…”
Section: Flannmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get a good return, the individual should know about the operations of the stock market, movements of the stock price and other factors. Generally, the stock market is noisy in nature which shatters the investors’ confident (Das et al , 2015). Due to numerous underlying factors (Weckman et al , 2008), stock market data are considered to be the complex time series data, and the prediction is viewed as the most difficult task due to its inconsistent nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%