2019
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2019.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-aligning microtensile setup: Application to single-crystal GaAs microscale tension–compression asymmetry

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very recently, researchers proposed a setup for tensile testing at these length scales, which makes the evaluation of the displacement more reliable. [ 68 ]…”
Section: Assessing Cellulose Scaffold Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, researchers proposed a setup for tensile testing at these length scales, which makes the evaluation of the displacement more reliable. [ 68 ]…”
Section: Assessing Cellulose Scaffold Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Casari et al (2019) presented a novel technology for investigating the mechanical behavior of specimens at the micro-scale under uniaxial tensile loading. The sample geometry was optimized using FE analysis, and the micro-tensile set-up promoted self-alignment to prevent stress concentrations outside the specimen gauge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While indentation based techniques, such as nanoindentation or micropillar compression, are by far the most common methods, tensile testing in such in situ setups has been conducted less frequently, as the experimental effort is considerably higher [6][7][8]. Independent of whether a push-to-pull geometry [8][9][10][11][12] or a gripping geometry [6,[13][14][15][16][17] is employed, the sample preparation is more tedious and the time required to conduct an experiment is distinctly longer compared to a single nanoindentation or microcompression test. Therefore, it is desirable to extract as much information as possible from such an individual tensile experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%