Proceedings of ISCAS'95 - International Symposium on Circuits and Systems
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.1995.523844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-test approach using accumulators as test pattern generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight assignments for these subsets is W(S1)={-,-, 1,-,1} and W(S2)={-, -, 0, 1, 0}, where a "_" denotes a weight assignment of 0.5, a "1" indicates that the input is constantly driven by the logic "1" value, and "0" indicates that the input is driven by the logic "0" value. In the first assignment, inputs A [2] and A[0] are constantly driven by "1", while inputs A [4], A [3], A [1] are pseudo randomly generated (i.e., have weights 0.5). Similarly, in the second weight assignment (subset S2), inputs A [2] and A[0] are constantly driven by "0", input A[1] is driven by "1" and inputs A [4] and A [3] are pseudo randomly generated.…”
Section: A Accumulator-based 3-weight Pattern Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weight assignments for these subsets is W(S1)={-,-, 1,-,1} and W(S2)={-, -, 0, 1, 0}, where a "_" denotes a weight assignment of 0.5, a "1" indicates that the input is constantly driven by the logic "1" value, and "0" indicates that the input is driven by the logic "0" value. In the first assignment, inputs A [2] and A[0] are constantly driven by "1", while inputs A [4], A [3], A [1] are pseudo randomly generated (i.e., have weights 0.5). Similarly, in the second weight assignment (subset S2), inputs A [2] and A[0] are constantly driven by "0", input A[1] is driven by "1" and inputs A [4] and A [3] are pseudo randomly generated.…”
Section: A Accumulator-based 3-weight Pattern Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arsenal of pseudorandom generators includes, among others, linear feedback shift registers(LFSRs) [1], cellular automata [2], and accumulators driven bya constant value [3]. For circuits with hard-to-detect faults, a large number of random patterns have to be generated before high fault coverage is achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques for generating pseudo-random patterns and compacting test responses using simple programs have been proposed in [1,9,18,[21][22][23]. Techniques for mixed-mode BIST using embedded processors have been described in [7] and [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…accumulators and counters) that very often occur in current very large scale integration (VLSI) circuits (e.g. data path architectures, digital signal processors) to generate test patterns to test one or more modules in the circuit [18,19]. The utilisation of existing modules for BIST purposes is favoured by (a) low hardware overhead, (b) low impact on the circuit normal operating speed, and (c) the fact that the modules used for BIST purposes are exercised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%