IEEE International Conference on Test, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/test.2005.1583964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-timed structural test methodology for timing anomalies due to defects and process variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a combinational circuit, ROPs and bridgings can be detected using a clock period smaller than that fixed by the critical path, flip-flops' timing parameters and clock skews [5,6,7]. In this way, the available slack is reduced and the transitions of the affected primary outputs may occur after the sampling instant, thus resulting in fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a combinational circuit, ROPs and bridgings can be detected using a clock period smaller than that fixed by the critical path, flip-flops' timing parameters and clock skews [5,6,7]. In this way, the available slack is reduced and the transitions of the affected primary outputs may occur after the sampling instant, thus resulting in fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the number of data, multiple sampling times are still used in [7], but the author exploits the ordering of the transition times of the signals belonging to the logic block under test. A DF is detected if the switching order of any two outputs is opposite to that evaluated by means of fault-free simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, hazard capture increases yield loss to unacceptable levels. Researchers have shown that Hazard-Aware testing can limit this loss when accuracy requirements are met for signal settling time estimates on target test paths [7][8] [15] [16]. Several, timing-aware test pattern generation algorithms have been proposed to increase the sensitivity of conventional transition fault tests to small-delay defects [3] [13][10] [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%