2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58323-1_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Semantic Grammar for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They divided the corpus into a five-fold split and computed the model performance in each fold. [Pereira et al 2020] assessed the quality of the predictions made by their semantic grammar by using it to reconstruct subject+verb+object sentences extracted from the CHILDES database [MacWhinney 2014]. All the experiments performed by [Pereira et al 2022] were in an automatic setting.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They divided the corpus into a five-fold split and computed the model performance in each fold. [Pereira et al 2020] assessed the quality of the predictions made by their semantic grammar by using it to reconstruct subject+verb+object sentences extracted from the CHILDES database [MacWhinney 2014]. All the experiments performed by [Pereira et al 2022] were in an automatic setting.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Pereira et al 2022] used a metric called Perplexity, which indicates how surprised a language model is when exposed to a new distribution of text. [Pereira et al 2020] evaluated their proposal's precision for reconstructing the sentences from a corpus. And finally, [Garcia et al 2016] assessed the system's quality on saving keystrokes.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations