2013
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syt028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Semantic Model for Species Description Applied to the Ensign Wasps (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) of New Caledonia

Abstract: Taxonomic descriptions are unparalleled sources of knowledge of life's phenotypic diversity. As natural language prose, these data sets are largely refractory to computation and integration with other sources of phenotypic data. By formalizing taxonomic descriptions using ontology-based semantic representation, we aim to increase the reusability and computability of taxonomists' primary data. Here, we present a revision of the ensign wasp (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) fauna of New Caledonia using this new model for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the PhenomeNET ontology imports the ChEBI [32] and Mouse Pathology [33] ontologies using an OWL import statement. Additionally, PhenomeNET includes all classes from the UBERON, the GO, the BioSpatial Ontology [34], the Zebrafish Anatomy ontology [35], the PATO ontology [4], the Cell Ontology [36], and the Neuro-Behavior Ontology [37]. However, these ontologies are not directly imported but rather pre-processed so that all disjointness axioms from these ontologies are excluded while all other axioms contained within them are included in the PhenomeNET ontology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the PhenomeNET ontology imports the ChEBI [32] and Mouse Pathology [33] ontologies using an OWL import statement. Additionally, PhenomeNET includes all classes from the UBERON, the GO, the BioSpatial Ontology [34], the Zebrafish Anatomy ontology [35], the PATO ontology [4], the Cell Ontology [36], and the Neuro-Behavior Ontology [37]. However, these ontologies are not directly imported but rather pre-processed so that all disjointness axioms from these ontologies are excluded while all other axioms contained within them are included in the PhenomeNET ontology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statements were written in OWL Manchester Syntax (see examples from Balhoff et al 2014, Balhoff et al 2013, Mikó et al 2015, Mikó et al 2014). All definitions and descriptions of morphological structures were mapped to classes in phenotype-focused ontologies, including: Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology (HAO), Phenotypic Quality Ontology (PATO), Biospatial Ontology (BSPO), OBO Relation Ontology (RO), Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) and Information Artifact Ontology (IAO); these ontologies are available at http://www.ontobee.org (Xiang et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All definitions and descriptions of morphological structures were mapped to classes in phenotype-focused ontologies, including: Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology (HAO), Phenotypic Quality Ontology (PATO), Biospatial Ontology (BSPO), OBO Relation Ontology (RO), Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) and Information Artifact Ontology (IAO); these ontologies are available at http://www.ontobee.org (Xiang et al 2011). By standardising taxonomic data through ontology-based semantic representation, we aim to facilitate future systematic work by facilitating the integration of taxonomic data sets from different sources, expediting computerised searches across these data (Balhoff et al 2013, Deans et al 2012, Mikó et al 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…material 2.) were composed in Protégé 5.0 (http://protege.stanford.edu/) using the OWL Manchester syntax (http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/) following Balhoff et al (2013) and Mikó et al (2014). The full data set, represented in OWL (Web Ontology Language; http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/ last accessed February 4, 2014), was deposited as a Resource Description Framework (RDF)-XML file (http://www.w3.org/ TR/REC-rdf-syntax/ in Figshare (https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2008203).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%