Case Induction step: (e 0 e 1 ) .By IH, e 0 t (ρ, r(σ ), r(κ )) = r(ev t (e 0 )ρ, σ , κ ) where κ = arg t (e 1 , ρ, a) and a κ = allockont t (σ, κ) σ = σ [a κ → {κ}] Thus holds by definitions of r, commit, _ .Case Induction step: if (e 0 , e 1 , e 2 ).By IH, e 0 t (ρ, r(σ ), r(κ )) = r(ev t (e 0 )ρ, σ , κ ) where κ = ifk t (e 1 , e 2 , ρ, a) andThus holds by definitions of r, commit, _ .theorem 9 B is a WEB on the transition system S, ⇒ .Proof. Let s, u, w ∈ S be arbitrary such that sBw and s ⇒ u. If w = s, the first case of WEB trivially holds with witness u. We assume w = s. Thus w = r(s). By cases on s ⇒ u:Since w = r(s), w = r(u) by definition of r. The second case of WEB holds by definition of erankt, and case analysis on w.Case ev (lit (l), ρ, σ, κ) −→ co (κ, l, σ).Since w = r(s), w = r(u) by definition of r. The second case of WEB holds by definition of erankt, and case analysis on w.∈ dom(ρ):Case x ∈ dom(ρ).By cases on tequal S (ctx)(ρ(x), t, δ):Case Equal.