2004
DOI: 10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0774:assodn>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sensitivity Study of Daytime Net Radiation during Snowmelt to Forest Canopy and Atmospheric Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
175
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
10
175
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bewley et al 2007). Whereas vegetation can shade snow on the ground from solar radiation, it can also greatly increase the net thermal radiation absorbed by snow (Sicart et al 2004). Moreover, sun-lit vegetation can have temperatures well in excess of the air and snow temperatures, further increasing the thermal radiation emitted to the snow (Pomeroy et al 2009).…”
Section: Callaghan and Tweedie 2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bewley et al 2007). Whereas vegetation can shade snow on the ground from solar radiation, it can also greatly increase the net thermal radiation absorbed by snow (Sicart et al 2004). Moreover, sun-lit vegetation can have temperatures well in excess of the air and snow temperatures, further increasing the thermal radiation emitted to the snow (Pomeroy et al 2009).…”
Section: Callaghan and Tweedie 2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snowpacks within a forest are subject to a complicated radiative environment due to longwave radiant emission from tree boles and the overlying canopy, as well as shading the snowpack surface from incoming shortwave radiation (Male and Granger 1981;DeWalle and Rango 2008;Pomeroy et al 2009;Lawler and Link 2011;Musselman et al 2012a,b). Sicart et al (2004) found that the effect of enhanced longwave and decreased shortwave radiation balanced the subcanopy daily net radiation for a wide range of canopy densities (in dense forests). In addition to radiative effects, forests shelter the snowpack from winds, thus reducing turbulent fluxes to and from the surface by an order of magnitude (Blanken et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information about Eq. (4) and discussions about subcanopy net shortwave radiation are provided elsewhere (e.g., Sicart et al 2004;DeWalle and Rango 2008;Pomeroy et al 2009, and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assumed the sensitivity of the VIS/NIR ratio to be 5% in our numerical experiments simply because the instrument accuracy for solar radiation observation is around 5% (Sicart et al, 2004). In the following sections, we refer to the sensitivity experiments as VIS0.45, VIS0.50, and VIS0.55 runs when the energy in the VIS band composes 45%, 50%, and 55% of the total incident solar radiation, respectively.…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%