The
α-helical coiled coil is one of the best-studied protein–protein
interaction motifs. As a result, sequence-to-structure relationships
are available for the prediction of natural coiled-coil sequences
and the de novo design of new ones. However, coiled
coils adopt a wide range of oligomeric states and topologies, and
our understanding of the specification of these and the discrimination
between them remains incomplete. Gaps in our knowledge assume more
importance as coiled coils are used increasingly to construct biomimetic
systems of higher complexity; for this, coiled-coil components need
to be robust, orthogonal, and transferable between contexts. Here,
we explore how the polar side chain asparagine (Asn, N) is tolerated
within otherwise hydrophobic helix–helix interfaces of coiled
coils. The long-held view is that Asn placed at certain sites of the
coiled-coil sequence repeat selects one oligomer state over others,
which is rationalized by the ability of the side chain to make hydrogen
bonds, or interactions with chelated ions within the coiled-coil interior
of the favored state. We test this with experiments on de
novo peptide sequences traditionally considered as directing
parallel dimers and trimers, and more widely through bioinformatics
analysis of natural coiled-coil sequences and structures. We find
that when located centrally, rather than near the termini of such
coiled-coil sequences, Asn does exert the anticipated oligomer-specifying
influence. However, outside of these bounds, Asn is observed less
frequently in the natural sequences, and the synthetic peptides are
hyperthermostable and lose oligomer-state specificity. These findings
highlight that not all regions of coiled-coil repeat sequences are
equivalent, and that care is needed when designing coiled-coil interfaces.