2016
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13017
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A set of PCRs for rapid identification and characterization ofPseudomonas syringaephylogroups

Abstract: To date, phylogenetic affiliation within the Ps. syringae complex was only possible by sequencing housekeeping genes. Here, we propose a rapid PCR-based method for the detection of specific phylogroups of the Ps. syringae complex. Furthermore, for the first time we reveal the presence of Ps. syringae strains belonging to phylogroups 10 and 13 as epiphytes on plants, whereas they had previously only been observed in aquatic habitats.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently other workers have examined Psa isolates from kiwifruit and compared these with environmental pseudomonads and pseudomonads from woody hosts including Prunus domestica (plum) and P. armenica (apricot) using MLSA (Bartoli et al 2015). This work led to the identification of gene regions that were used to design polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers that could distinguish between phylogroups of Pseudomonas syringae (Borschinger et al 2016). Furthermore, this analysis showed that strains isolated from the environment could be pathogenic on economically important hosts (Bartoli et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently other workers have examined Psa isolates from kiwifruit and compared these with environmental pseudomonads and pseudomonads from woody hosts including Prunus domestica (plum) and P. armenica (apricot) using MLSA (Bartoli et al 2015). This work led to the identification of gene regions that were used to design polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers that could distinguish between phylogroups of Pseudomonas syringae (Borschinger et al 2016). Furthermore, this analysis showed that strains isolated from the environment could be pathogenic on economically important hosts (Bartoli et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…oryzae 1_6). These strains represent much of the known phylogenetic breadth of plant pathogenic strains commonly included within the species P. syringae , although some have been taxonomically reclassified but are still considered P. syringae sensu lato ( Sarkar and Guttman, 2004 ; Bull et al, 2011 ; Borschinger et al, 2016 ). Additionally, two strains thought to be non-pathogenic on plants (Cit7 and TLP2) are included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal tissues of 30 buds from each scion variety were analysed using culture-dependent methods. Based on the colony morphology, Pseudomonas-like colonies from each sample were cultured on King's B medium and evaluated in a hypersensitive reaction test on tobacco and for ice nucleation activity and determined by the FAME method [1][2][3]. A subset of strains determined by FAME as belonging to the genus Pseudomonas with a similarity index of SimIndex≥0.5 and/or strains with positive HR and INA within (0 °C; -6 °C) were attributed to the phylogroups of Pseudomonas syringae (Ps) complex and their pathogenicity on detached apricot twigs was evaluated [4,5].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%