2018
DOI: 10.3233/asy-171459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sharp regularity result for the Euler equation with a free interface

Abstract: We establish a priori estimates for local-in-time existence of solutions to the water wave model consisting of the 3D incompressible Euler equations on a domain with a free surface, without surface tension, under minimal regularity assumptions on the initial data and the Rayleigh–Taylor sign condition. The initial data are allowed to be rotational and they are assumed to belong to [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is arbitrary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the proof in [KTVW] uses in an essential way the preservation of Lagrangian vorticity, which is a property that does not hold in the 3D case. Another paper [KT4] considers the problem in ALE coordinates (see [MC] for the ALE coordinates in the fluid-structure interaction problem), but the proof requires an additional assumption on the initial data, due to additional regularity required by the Lagrangian variable on the boundary; for instance, the present paper shows that the conditions of theorem 1 (see below) suffice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, the proof in [KTVW] uses in an essential way the preservation of Lagrangian vorticity, which is a property that does not hold in the 3D case. Another paper [KT4] considers the problem in ALE coordinates (see [MC] for the ALE coordinates in the fluid-structure interaction problem), but the proof requires an additional assumption on the initial data, due to additional regularity required by the Lagrangian variable on the boundary; for instance, the present paper shows that the conditions of theorem 1 (see below) suffice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, the proof in [KTVW] uses in an essential way the preservation of Lagrangian vorticity, which is a property that does not hold in the 3D case. Another paper [KT4] considers the problem in ALE coordinates (cf. [MC] for the ALE coordinates in the fluid-structure interaction problem), but the proof requires an additional assumption on the initial data, due to additional regularity required by the Lagrangian variable on the boundary; for instance, the present paper shows that the conditions of Theorem 1 (see below) suffice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%