1995
DOI: 10.1002/qre.4680110309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A shewhart‐like charting technique for high yield processes

Abstract: A Shewhart‐like charting technique is developed in this paper to overcome the difficulties the traditional control chart encounters in the control of processes with a very low fraction non‐conforming. The technique uses the number of conforming items between two consecutive non‐conforming ones to monitor the fraction non‐conforming of a process, leading to a chart that is informative and easy to interpret. The approach discussed is especially suitable for real‐time and automatic statistical quality control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Control limits were initially set by Calvin and Goh using approximations on the basis of the geometric distribution. The control limits most commonly used for the CCC chart are derived from the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of Y , that is, Fy=1()1py, for y = 1,2,… Bourke and Xie et al set the control limits for an in‐control value of p 0 based on the probability limits, where F (LCL) ≈ α /2 and F (UCL) ≈ 1 − α /2 to obtain an overall false alarm rate close to α , with roughly equal tail probabilities. These control limits are better to use than the symmetric ‘3–sigma’ limits for the CCC chart because the geometric distribution is quite skewed.…”
Section: Shewhart Control Charts Based On the Geometric Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Control limits were initially set by Calvin and Goh using approximations on the basis of the geometric distribution. The control limits most commonly used for the CCC chart are derived from the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of Y , that is, Fy=1()1py, for y = 1,2,… Bourke and Xie et al set the control limits for an in‐control value of p 0 based on the probability limits, where F (LCL) ≈ α /2 and F (UCL) ≈ 1 − α /2 to obtain an overall false alarm rate close to α , with roughly equal tail probabilities. These control limits are better to use than the symmetric ‘3–sigma’ limits for the CCC chart because the geometric distribution is quite skewed.…”
Section: Shewhart Control Charts Based On the Geometric Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, process deterioration may not be detected. The authors recommended using probability limits similar to what was proposed by Xie et al for the CCC chart. The technical issues with the g ‐chart were also discussed by Xie et al …”
Section: Control Charts Based On the Negative Binomial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This chart is also known as cumulative count of conforming (CCC) chart. Xie et al (1995) argued that the original layout of Calvin's chart is difficult to interpret and provided an improved version of the chart layout. Kuralmani et al (2002) proposed a conditional CCC chart which is similar to the CCC chart.…”
Section: Review Of Control Charts For High Yield Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRL follows a geometric distribution with cdf [41] where p is the probability of a non-conforming TBE, X on the T/S sub-chart, such thatSince the detection of an increase in p is the only concern, the lower control limit of the CRL/S sub-chart, (rounded to an integer) is sufficient [16], [41] …”
Section: Literature Review: a Review On Time-between-events Control Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, the conforming run length (CRL) control chart was proposed and has been studied for better interpretation purposes [16], [17]. The CRL chart is also known as the geometric chart [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%