1986
DOI: 10.2307/2582567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Ship Collision Model for Overtaking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative model for ship get away manoeuvres in confined waters is also the rigid-body dynamic model for ship motion (Yavin et al ., 1994, Yavin et al ., 1995) based on stochastic optimum control (Lewis, 1986). On the other hand, a specialised model for collision free overtaking is proposed (Curtis, 1986).…”
Section: Ship Collision Avoidance Mathematical Models and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative model for ship get away manoeuvres in confined waters is also the rigid-body dynamic model for ship motion (Yavin et al ., 1994, Yavin et al ., 1995) based on stochastic optimum control (Lewis, 1986). On the other hand, a specialised model for collision free overtaking is proposed (Curtis, 1986).…”
Section: Ship Collision Avoidance Mathematical Models and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the large number of objects involved, massive parallel computations are now being applied [ 24 ]. In another example, a mathematical model was developed to investigate the collision probability and minimum safe overtaking distance of two vessels at sea [ 25 ]. This model was used to derive a safe overtaking distance dependent on overtaking speed and further vessel characteristics like the radius of turn and response time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these methods, a craft that is navigating in parallel to the observing vessel would not account for risk, as for instance in a traffic separation scheme as defined by the International Maritime Organization (IMO, 2013). However, the navigator's judgement of the risk posed by a neighbouring craft seems to involve factors other than just the geometric calculation of trajectories (Goerlandt and Montewka, 2015; Curtis, 1986). Furthermore, in “many to many” scenarios, where many craft are at risk of colliding with one another, perception of risk seems to become even more complex and depends on how different craft interact with each another and on their particular idiosyncrasies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%