2018
DOI: 10.1109/lmwc.2018.2831450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SiGe HBT $D$ -Band LNA With Butterworth Response and Noise Reduction Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although [280] had better NF and P dc than [305], its IIP 3 , A V and S 11 were worse. Meanwhile, other BiCMOS designs had higher P dc (11.7 to 95 mW) while some of them even had higher NF or lower A V [163,166,213,237,253,272,279,296,310,320,324,330,336,352].…”
Section: Optimum Work Of the 2010smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although [280] had better NF and P dc than [305], its IIP 3 , A V and S 11 were worse. Meanwhile, other BiCMOS designs had higher P dc (11.7 to 95 mW) while some of them even had higher NF or lower A V [163,166,213,237,253,272,279,296,310,320,324,330,336,352].…”
Section: Optimum Work Of the 2010smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-212, 214-221, 223, 225-236, 238, 240, 242-252, 254, 256-262, 264, 266-268, 270, 271, 273-277, 282, 283, 285-293, 295, 298, 302- 309, 311, 312, 314, 315, 317-319, 321, 322, 325-328, 331-333, 335, 337-341, 346-351, 355-358, 360], the BiCMOS[163,166,213,237,253,272,279,280,296,305,310,320,324,330,336,352] and the HEMT[174, 186, 187, 191, 222, 241, 255, 284, 294, 298-301, 313, 323, 329, 342-345, 353, 359].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the frequency-reconfigurable LNAs with two RF-MEMS switches [8], [9], it is more compact (because the bias and RF-MEMS circuits barely scale with frequency), and exhibits a simpler configuration and a lower P DC . It is also considerably more compact than the (notreconfigurable) LNAs in [1], [3][5], [7], which operate at comparable frequencies. The proposed LNA was designed to feature a well-balanced gain and noise figure in both states at the expense of lower gain and higher P DC .…”
Section: Lna Design and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SiGe BiCMOS technology has demonstrated maturity and high performance for D-band wireless systems and sensors [2,7,8]. Recent advances in 0.13 µm SiGe BiCMOS hetero junction bipolar transistor (HBT) devices [9] have enabled the development of fixed-frequency LNAs using two to four HBT stages, typically in a cascode configuration [1,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], featuring a high gain G ( G = 24 dB at 158 GHz [1]) and low noise figure F ( F = 5.1 dB at 144.5 GHz [14]). Other silicon technologies, such as 65- and 28-nm SOI CMOS, are also being used to fabricate D-band LNAs [18,19,20], featuring comparable gain but a higher noise figure ( G = 15.7 dB and F = 8.5 dB at 160 GHz [20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding miniaturization, the frequency-reconfigurable D-band LNA presented in [17] exhibits both, the smallest chip area, A CHIP , and core area (without RF- and DC-pads), A CORE , compared to the other D-band LNAs [1,10,11,12,13,14]. In [17], the RF-MEMS switch area is 0.031 mm 2 , which supposes a 29% of A CORE ( A CORE = 0.107 mm 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%