2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple algorithm for the fast calculation of higher order derivatives of the inverse function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Itskov et al (2010), this series was further continued as follows Dargazany et al 2013) proposed a simple and fast recurrence procedure calculating Taylor series coefficients of the inverse function. This formula was further applied to the inverse Langevin function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Itskov et al (2010), this series was further continued as follows Dargazany et al 2013) proposed a simple and fast recurrence procedure calculating Taylor series coefficients of the inverse function. This formula was further applied to the inverse Langevin function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this software, we wrote a short script which can be used for finding a solution of higher order derivatives of the inverse function in a simple and elegant way. The mentioned problem was discussed by Jarecki and Ziabicki (2002) and Dargazany et al (2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They stated that the solution based on 115 series terms shows the best accuracy within the region [0, 0.95] between examined approximations. This method of calculation of higher order derivatives of the inverse function was also presented by Dargazany et al (2013). The authors compared it with other methods known in literature both with respect to the computation time and memory usage.…”
Section: Previous Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(38) cannot be solved analytically. Hence the iterative method is used to solve the equation [58]. The step size of the parameter variation is chosen based on the sensitivity of the parameter to the maximum deflection (mid-length deflection).…”
Section: Numerical Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%