2018
DOI: 10.2174/1386207320666171002123027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple and Efficient Synthesis of 4-Arylacridinediones and 6-Aryldiindeno[1,2-b:2,1-e]pyridinediones using CuI Nanoparticles as Catalyst under Solvent-Free Conditions

Abstract: A solvent-free condensation between aromatic aldehydes, ammonium acetate and active methylene compounds comprising dimedone or 1,3-indanedione, in the presence of CuI nanoparticles as an efficient and recyclable catalyst leads to the formation of 4-arylacridinediones and 6-aryldiindeno[1,2-b:2,1-e]pyridinediones. This novel and practical approach has a number of advantages for instance, the condensation itself is solvent-free, the total amount of solvent used in the whole process is significantly decreased, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14]. Since then several improved catalysts reported for the synthesis of 1,8-dioxodecahydroacridine derivatives are montmorillonit [15], βcyclodextrin monosulphonic acid [16], CuI nanoparticles [17], citric acid/EtOH reflux [18], ionic liquids [19], Co(NO3)2.6H2O [20], Fe3O4@SiO2-PEG/NH2 [21], Fe3O4/HT-SMTU-ZnII [22], sulphonated sawdust (SD-OSO3H) [23] in toxic/nontoxic solvents using microwave, ultrasound, reflux, and traditional heating methods [24,25]. However, these methods have some disadvantages such as requireing expensive catalysts and their recovery and reusability, higher temperature, longer reaction time, cumbersome workup process and also lower yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14]. Since then several improved catalysts reported for the synthesis of 1,8-dioxodecahydroacridine derivatives are montmorillonit [15], βcyclodextrin monosulphonic acid [16], CuI nanoparticles [17], citric acid/EtOH reflux [18], ionic liquids [19], Co(NO3)2.6H2O [20], Fe3O4@SiO2-PEG/NH2 [21], Fe3O4/HT-SMTU-ZnII [22], sulphonated sawdust (SD-OSO3H) [23] in toxic/nontoxic solvents using microwave, ultrasound, reflux, and traditional heating methods [24,25]. However, these methods have some disadvantages such as requireing expensive catalysts and their recovery and reusability, higher temperature, longer reaction time, cumbersome workup process and also lower yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%