2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2019.2903504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple and General Method for Filtering Power Divider With Frequency-Fixed and Frequency-Tunable Fully Canonical Filtering-Response Demonstrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can find that R iso of proposed FPD is related to operation bandwidth FBW a , filter order N , in-band ripple L Ar , power-division ratio k 2 , resonator impedance Z r1a , and resonator type (λ/2 or λ/4 resonator), but not correlated to terminated impedances of input and output. This conclusion is different to other reported formulas for R iso , such as R iso = Z L (k+ 1/k) in [32], and R iso = R S (1 + k 2 ) 2 /k 2 in [33].…”
Section: Isolationcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can find that R iso of proposed FPD is related to operation bandwidth FBW a , filter order N , in-band ripple L Ar , power-division ratio k 2 , resonator impedance Z r1a , and resonator type (λ/2 or λ/4 resonator), but not correlated to terminated impedances of input and output. This conclusion is different to other reported formulas for R iso , such as R iso = Z L (k+ 1/k) in [32], and R iso = R S (1 + k 2 ) 2 /k 2 in [33].…”
Section: Isolationcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…where c is the light velocity and ε re is effective dielectric constant. Thirdly, coupling coefficients and external quality factor can be determined by (33) can be extracted by using the approach in [35] and relevant results are depicted in Fig. 18.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Sixth-order 120 • Filtering Power Divider (Fpd) On λ/4 Resonatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, by calculating the theoretical S ‐parameters S 21 and S 31 from [12], the PDRs can be derived as, ][1em4ptABCD=][1em4ptA1B1C1D1][1em4pt11/jωC3101][1em4ptA2B2C2D2 S21=S21e2=124Z04AZ0+B+4CZ02+DZ0 PDR=||S212/||S312/||S412/||S512=f)(C31,C32,C33,C34thickmathspacethickmathspacethickmathspacethickmathspacewhere A 1 , B 1 , C 1 and D 1 are the elements of the ABCD matrix between node a and node b while A 2 , B 2 , C 2 and D 2 are the elements of the ABCD matrix between node c and node d . Similarly, it can be obtained that the frequency response S i 1 ( i = 3, 4, 5) is the function of C 3 i ( i = 2, 3, 4), can be obtained.…”
Section: Design and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, by calculating the theoretical S-parameters S 21 and S 31 from [12], the PDRs can be derived as,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], three defect ground structures (DGSs) were used for each filtering channel to realise a wide stopband. Besides bandstop structures, the cross‐coupling can also be used to generate transmission zeroes [4]. For the reported filtering devices, the above‐mentioned methods are most commonly used for improving the stopband property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%