2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and rapid HPLC–MS method for the simultaneous determination of epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: Application to the secretion of bovine chromaffin cell cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
180
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 438 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
180
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When we compare the LODs of the present method with those of the HPLC-MS method without derivatization, the present method revealed 32.5 times better sensitivity with DA and 3.9 times better sensitivity with 5-HT than HPLC-MS without derivatization since the detection limits of DA and 5-HT by HPLC-MS method without derivatization were 6.5 ng/mL and 0.78 ng/mL, respectively. 17) Upon comparison of the present method with the HPLC-FLD method with derivitization, it was found that the LODs of DA and 5-HT using HPLC-FLD method have approximately 67 times better sensitivity with DA and 38 times better sensitivity with 5-HT than those using the present method. However, the HPLC-FLD method requires the vigorous reaction conditions of heating to 50°C for 20 min for the derivatization, which are not desirable reaction conditions for biological samples.…”
Section: Application Of the Methods To Real Biological Samplesmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When we compare the LODs of the present method with those of the HPLC-MS method without derivatization, the present method revealed 32.5 times better sensitivity with DA and 3.9 times better sensitivity with 5-HT than HPLC-MS without derivatization since the detection limits of DA and 5-HT by HPLC-MS method without derivatization were 6.5 ng/mL and 0.78 ng/mL, respectively. 17) Upon comparison of the present method with the HPLC-FLD method with derivitization, it was found that the LODs of DA and 5-HT using HPLC-FLD method have approximately 67 times better sensitivity with DA and 38 times better sensitivity with 5-HT than those using the present method. However, the HPLC-FLD method requires the vigorous reaction conditions of heating to 50°C for 20 min for the derivatization, which are not desirable reaction conditions for biological samples.…”
Section: Application Of the Methods To Real Biological Samplesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…HPLC coupled with MS, which can be used to identify analytes simply on the basis of their m/z (mass-to-charge) ratios, 15,16) is a popular and powerful technique for analyzing neurotransmitters in several biological fluids. 17) However, it was to our interest that there was no report for the simultaneous determination of neurotransmitters containing different ionizable groups such as carboxylic acid or amino groups in the biological samples by using the HPLC-MS method. Thus, in order to determine a neurotransmitter containing an amino group, we have to use a positive ion polarity mode of MS condition while using a negative ion polarity mode of MS condition for determining a neurotransmitter containing a carboxylic acid group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with low cost, rapidness, and simplicity, the MnO 2 NWs-RGO/GCEs are expected to detect dopamine in various real samples. 6 ]), sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH 2 PO 4 ), disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na 2 HPO 4 ), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and ethyl alcohol were analytical grade and purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Dopamine was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co (St. Louis, CA, USA).…”
Section: Electrochemical Sensing Perfomances Of Mno 2 Nws-rgo/gcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is of great significance to detect dopamine accurately at a physiological level in the earlier prevention and clinical diagnosis of these neurological diseases. To date, various techniques have been developed to detect dopamine, including but not limited to high performance liquid chromatography [6], mass spectrometry, fluorescent spectrometry [7], capillary electrophoresis [8,9], and electrochemiluminescence [10,11]. Despite being reliable and precise, these methods often suffer from drawbacks such as expensive instruments, complex and time-consuming analytical procedures, and the requirement of experienced technical staff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is for this reason that DA has been long used as an important biomarker in the diagnosis of these neural diseases. Electrochemical methods [27] [28], capillary electrophoresis [29] [30], and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [31] are conventional analytical methods for the detection of DA. However, these methods are time consuming and require expensive instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%