1989
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990100604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple and rapid method for determining the linearity of a flow cytometer amplification system

Abstract: We describe a simple and rapid method for determining the linearity of a flow cytometer amplification system. The method is based on a fundamental characteristic of linear amplifiers: The difference between two amplified signals increases linearly with increasing amplifier gain. Two populations of beads or cells, differing slightly in fluorescence intensity, are analyzed by the flow cytometer at increasing photomultiplier tube high-voltage settings. The distribution of the populations' mean difference versus m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…or Oryza sativa L. as internal standards are approximately 1.5 times larger (0.13 pg/1C). Since the genome sizes of G. max and O. sativa are, respectively, 12.5 and 5.6 times larger than the lowest (and most reliable) published value for S. moellendorffii (Wang et al 2005), this discrepancy is presumably the result of nonlinearity-i.e., a compression artifact of linear amplification that is exasperated by larger ranges of signal intensity (Bagwell et al 1989;Doležel and Bartoš 2005). These discrepancies cannot be attributed to the secondary chemistry of S. moellendorffii and (or) nuclear autofluorescence given the data published by Wang et al, which clearly demonstrate an increase in estimated S. moellendorffii genome size with increasing internal standard size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…or Oryza sativa L. as internal standards are approximately 1.5 times larger (0.13 pg/1C). Since the genome sizes of G. max and O. sativa are, respectively, 12.5 and 5.6 times larger than the lowest (and most reliable) published value for S. moellendorffii (Wang et al 2005), this discrepancy is presumably the result of nonlinearity-i.e., a compression artifact of linear amplification that is exasperated by larger ranges of signal intensity (Bagwell et al 1989;Doležel and Bartoš 2005). These discrepancies cannot be attributed to the secondary chemistry of S. moellendorffii and (or) nuclear autofluorescence given the data published by Wang et al, which clearly demonstrate an increase in estimated S. moellendorffii genome size with increasing internal standard size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fluorescence intensity was measured on a 3-decade log amplifier. Linearity of the amplifier was confirmed using previously described methods (25). Mean channel fluorescence values were then converted to relative linear values, for direct comparison of intensity differences (26).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed nuclei are used as standards for DNA measurements or tools for linearity of fluorescence verification (2,3). Stabilized cells can potentially be used as controls and calibrators (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%