2010
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple apparatus for measuring cell settling velocity

Abstract: Accurate cell settling velocity determination is critical for perfusion culture using a gravity settler for cell retention. We have developed a simple apparatus (a “settling column”) for measuring settling velocity and have validated the procedure with 15‐μm polystyrene particles with known physical properties. The measured settling velocity of the polystyrene particles is within 4% of the value obtained using the traditional Stokes' law approach. The settling velocities of three hybridoma cell lines were meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Viability of the perfusate samples at maximum viable cell concentration (93.1 ± 4.8%) was consistently higher than that of the homogenous microscale cultures (86.2 ± 5.5%; n = 16, p < 0.001). Although cell viability was reported to affect settling velocity in early reports (Searles et al, ), with nonviable cells moving 30–50% slower than viable cells (Wang & Belovich, ), this was not observed in the cultures investigated here. However, given the difference in size, the cells removed were more likely those, which displayed lower specific productivity due to their stage in cell cycle, as reported earlier (Lloyd, Holmes, Jackson, Emery, & Al‐Rubeai, ).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Viability of the perfusate samples at maximum viable cell concentration (93.1 ± 4.8%) was consistently higher than that of the homogenous microscale cultures (86.2 ± 5.5%; n = 16, p < 0.001). Although cell viability was reported to affect settling velocity in early reports (Searles et al, ), with nonviable cells moving 30–50% slower than viable cells (Wang & Belovich, ), this was not observed in the cultures investigated here. However, given the difference in size, the cells removed were more likely those, which displayed lower specific productivity due to their stage in cell cycle, as reported earlier (Lloyd, Holmes, Jackson, Emery, & Al‐Rubeai, ).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…At 36 ll/min they travel from inlet to the trapping region in 4.4 s on average and at a sedimentation rate of 7.8 lm/s. 51 Their vertical position is between 6 lm (average radius) and 10 lm from the floor of the device. Two particles with the same sign of the Clausius-Mossotti factor are attracted to each other when the pair is aligned along the electric field and they repel when the pair is aligned perpendicularly to the field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The particle settling velocity of a given suspension can be measured directly 29 or can be calculated based on the expression derived from Stokes' law for low particle concentrations and low Reynolds number:…”
Section: Settler Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The mean diameter of the microspheres was selected to be 16 lm with a density of 1.05 g/mL to mimic typical single mammalian cell properties. Bulk solutions of copolymer microsphere suspensions were purchased from Duke Scientific Corporation (Catalog number 7516C, Palo Alto, CA).…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%