2015
DOI: 10.1111/fme.12103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple approach for assigning the conservation status of freshwater fish based on their natural variability – a case study from the Iberian Ecoregion

Abstract: A simple, non‐lethal method for assigning conservation status is proposed based on three conservation classes (favourable, unfavourable/inadequate and unfavourable/bad) to fish species based on their natural population variability. To demonstrate this approach, conservation classes were allocated to three native fish species (brown trout Salmo trutta L., northern Iberian chub Squalius carolitertii (Doadrio), and northern straight‐mouth nase, Pseudochondrostoma duriense (Coelho) based on basic population variab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Araújo et al., 2011; Costa‐Pereira, Tavares, Camargo, & Araújo, 2017). Some sampling events included high consumer densities (range: 0.01–0.47 and 0–0.65 ind./m 2 for brown trout and Atlantic salmon, respectively) according to a previous categorisation of salmonids densities (Sánchez‐Hernández, Cobo, & Amundsen, 2015). However, it is possible that prey densities were not low enough (range: 43.9–4,351.7 ind./m 2 ) to limit food consumption in comparison to other riverine systems with substantially higher variation in benthic macroinvertebrate production (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Araújo et al., 2011; Costa‐Pereira, Tavares, Camargo, & Araújo, 2017). Some sampling events included high consumer densities (range: 0.01–0.47 and 0–0.65 ind./m 2 for brown trout and Atlantic salmon, respectively) according to a previous categorisation of salmonids densities (Sánchez‐Hernández, Cobo, & Amundsen, 2015). However, it is possible that prey densities were not low enough (range: 43.9–4,351.7 ind./m 2 ) to limit food consumption in comparison to other riverine systems with substantially higher variation in benthic macroinvertebrate production (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evaluation of the conservation status of fish or lamprey species requires knowledge on temporal changes in population density and biomass and a comparison with established reference condition categories (Cowx et al 2009;Sánchez-Hernández et al 2015). Values of density and biomass of P. marinus larvae recorded in the accessible sections of Galician rivers, in general, changed from moderate to high (reference categories from Silva et al 2014b), showing signs of an upward trend in population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferring abundance change from distribution data Many species are declining or facing range retractions (Hayhow et al, 2016), and it is important to monitor their population trends. Species with highly variable population dynamics tend to be at high risk of extinction (Pimm et al, 1998;Vucetich et al, 2000;Oliver et al, 2012) and thus our measure of variability in distribution records has ecological value, with the potential to assist conservation assessments by helping to identify species at risk of extinction or habitats in need of management (Meyer et al, 2015;S anchez-Hern andez et al, 2015). Our multispecies analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%