2010
DOI: 10.1260/0263-0923.29.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Criterion for Low Frequency Noise Emission Assessment

Abstract: There are many sources of Low Frequency Noise (LFN) in the environment and complaints about the effect of higher level LFN in the form in the form of "rumble", a "feeling of pressure" and the resultant headaches and nausea have been known for decades. A number of different European methods have been suggested for assessment of LFN, all based on measured indoor noise levels. The administrative procedures used in individual countries to enforce any LFN criteria are quite different but they are all generally base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured noise levels are in breach of the proposed criteria set out by Broner and Knight-Merz (2011). Furthermore, by logarithmically adding the 25Hz, 31.5 Hz and 40Hz third octave band levels it is possible to compare the measurements with the 31.5Hz octave band criterion of 60dB set by the British Gas Corporation.…”
Section: Spectrum Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The measured noise levels are in breach of the proposed criteria set out by Broner and Knight-Merz (2011). Furthermore, by logarithmically adding the 25Hz, 31.5 Hz and 40Hz third octave band levels it is possible to compare the measurements with the 31.5Hz octave band criterion of 60dB set by the British Gas Corporation.…”
Section: Spectrum Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kellberg et al's work (1997) suggests that if the difference between the noise values for the two weightings -dB(C)-dB(A) -is greater than 15 dB, there is potential for a low frequency noise problem. Similar guidance exists in Australia where the New South Wales Industrial Noise Policy (INP) recommends that a 5 dB modifying factor be added to the outdoor A-weighted sound pressure level when the 'C' weighted sound pressure level minus the 'A' weighted sound pressure level difference is 15 dB or greater (Broner, 2011).While this indicator does not provide definitive proof of a low frequency noise problem, it points to the need for further investigation within narrower frequency bands. The research of Kjellberg et al also suggests that if the 15dB value is exceeded, a useful rule of thumb is to add 6 dB to the corresponding A-weighted value to determine the equivalent level of annoyance and nuisance.…”
Section: Detecting Low Frequency Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequency-specific or overall sound levels we measured are not known to cause adverse health effects. However, complaints of annoyance due to low frequency noise tend to be associated with an unbalanced noise spectrum [Broner 2010;Broner and Leventhall 1983], which can occur when sound levels in the low frequencies are higher relative to the sound levels in the higher frequencies.…”
Section: B-12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-frequency railway noise can easily pass through walls, windows, and other obstacles and can harm people's physical and mental health. Individuals subjected to environments characterized by chronic lowfrequency noise can suffer from insomnia, headache, tinnitus, discomfort, chest tightness, abdominal pressure, and other psychological and physical symptoms [3,4]. A spectrum analyzer is necessary for quantitative monitoring of low-frequency noise, but there are currently no national testing standards or engineering norms regarding lowfrequency railway noise in China or several other countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%