2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6377(01)00069-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple efficient approximation scheme for the restricted shortest path problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
205
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
205
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…shortest path [42] (see also [20,27]), and matching [6]. The approach in [35] easily generalizes to the case of matroid basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…shortest path [42] (see also [20,27]), and matching [6]. The approach in [35] easily generalizes to the case of matroid basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One basic approach is combining dynamic programming (which solves the problem for polynomial weights and lengths) with rounding and scaling techniques (to reduce the problem to the case of polynomial quantities). This leads for example to the FPTAS for 1-budgeted shortest path [20,27,42]. Another fundamental technique is the Lagrangian relaxation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ergun et al [2] gave another (1 + ε; 1)-FPTAS with improved running time of O(mn/ε). For general graphs Lorenz and Raz [9] proposed an (1 + ε; 1)-FPTAS with time complexity of O(mn(log log n + 1/ε)). Goel et al [5] gave an (1; 1 + ε)-FPTAS with running time O((m + n log n)n/ε).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1 + ε)-FPTAS. Our multi-criteria FPTAS is a dynamic programming algorithm, similar to the SPPP algorithm of Lorenz and Raz [9], with a combination of the rounding technique of Song and Sahni [11]. The time complexity of our multi-criteria approximation scheme is O(m(n/ε) k ), which for k = 1 matches that of Ergun et al [2], who provided an (1 + ε; 1)-FPTAS for the RCSPP restricted to acyclic graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to compare results of the RSP-based search in the G D graph to the simple shortest-path search in the G C graph we developed a much simpler dynamic programming solution, provided below. The computational complexity of this algorithm is pseudo-polynomial, but it can be turned into FPAS (fully polynomial approximation scheme) by using the approximation from [5]. In the following algorithm, C[v, t] denotes a vector associated with each node v, which stores the minimum uncertainty on any path from v s to v, that has a total cost of t. T max is the maximum cost of a path from v s to v g in the graph, obtained by search w.r.t the cost information only.…”
Section: Planning the Positioning Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%