2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.03.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple electrochemical approach to fabricate functionalized MWCNT-nanogold decorated PEDOT nanohybrid for simultaneous quantification of uric acid, xanthine and hypoxanthine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sharp increase in the reduction peak current was observed for each addition after dipping the electrode into a particular solution for 240 s at an applied potential of −0.1 V (i.e., deposition potential). The peak was shifted to a negative potential as the concentration of PT enhanced, indicating a diffusion-controlled process [ 40 ]. The concentration-dependent linear plot depicts good linearity ( Figure 9B , Figure 9C ) with a calibration equation of I p (μA) = 3.5735 [PT] + 12.018 ( R ² = 0.9871) for the range of 0.1–11 μM, I p (μA) = 0.2916 [PT] + 3.7526 ( R ² = 0.9936) for 3–15 nM, I p (μA) = 19.176 [PT] + 4.2723 ( R ² = 0.9367) for 0.03–0.15 nM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sharp increase in the reduction peak current was observed for each addition after dipping the electrode into a particular solution for 240 s at an applied potential of −0.1 V (i.e., deposition potential). The peak was shifted to a negative potential as the concentration of PT enhanced, indicating a diffusion-controlled process [ 40 ]. The concentration-dependent linear plot depicts good linearity ( Figure 9B , Figure 9C ) with a calibration equation of I p (μA) = 3.5735 [PT] + 12.018 ( R ² = 0.9871) for the range of 0.1–11 μM, I p (μA) = 0.2916 [PT] + 3.7526 ( R ² = 0.9936) for 3–15 nM, I p (μA) = 19.176 [PT] + 4.2723 ( R ² = 0.9367) for 0.03–0.15 nM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scan-rate effect.-To study the scan-rate effect on the electrochemical behavior of Xn and UA on BP/PET platform, CV was performed by applying various potential scan-rates. Figures 3A Human urine polymerized film of 6-thioguanine (6-TG) modified GCE 22 1-500 2-1600 0.30 0.06 Human urine and serum Reduced graphene oxide modified GCE 23 10-60 20-120 0.11 0.088 Human blood plasma and urine cathodically pretreated poly(1-aminoanthraquinone) (PAAQ)-modified electrode 24 -35-420 -11.5 Human urine Au-PEDOT-fMWCNT/GCE 25 0.05-175 0.1-800 0.091 0.199 Fish extracts, Human urine and serum Pre-anodized nontronite-coated screen-printed carbon electrodes (NSPEs * ) 26 2-40 2-40 0.07 0.42 blood plasma and urine samples Toray paper 20 7-300 100-1000 6. and 3B shows that the anodic peak current increase with increase in scan-rate. Figure 3 shows that anodic current is directly proportional to the scan-rate υ½, as per Randle-Sevick equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before modification of GCE, it was cleaned with alumina powder (0.05 μm), followed by 5 min of ultrasonication in deionized water and ethanol (1:1). 5,6 Lysozyme@Au-GSH (2 μL) was drop cast with 1 μL of Nafion on the GCE and dried at room temperature for 20 min. The impedance spectra were recorded using an IVIUMStat…”
Section: Fabrication Of Electrode For Biosensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…suitable for the fabrication of nanosensors to enhance the sensitivity, specificity, and detection limits of target analytes. 5,6 Nanoparticles can be synthesized through physical, chemical, or biological routes. [7][8][9] Biological processes are more economic, safe, and environmentfriendly as there is minimum use of chemical compounds and hence less chance of producing toxic substances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%