2020
DOI: 10.3390/metabo10070294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple GC-MS/MS Method for Determination of Smoke Taint-Related Volatile Phenols in Grapes

Abstract: Volatile phenols (VPs) derived from smoke-exposed grapes are known to confer a smoky flavor to wine. Current methods for determination of VPs in grape berries either involve complex sample purification/derivatization steps or employ two analytical platforms for free and bound VP fractions. We report here a simple gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) method for quantification of both free and bound VPs in grapes, based on optimized (1) GC-MS/MS parameters, (2) an analyte extraction procedure, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the severity of smoke taint is determined analytically by measuring volatile phenols by GC-MS and/or volatile phenol glycoconjugates by LC-MS; bound volatile phenols can also be measured by GC-MS following acid hydrolysis of juice or wine [ 40 , 51 , 53 ]. Where industry relies on commercial laboratories for compositional analysis, this can be costly, and is therefore, not readily accessible to every vineyard or winery [ 50 , 69 ]. These methods also rely on existing smoke taint marker compounds, but there is some doubt as to whether all of the compounds responsible for smoke taint have actually been identified [ 33 , 34 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the severity of smoke taint is determined analytically by measuring volatile phenols by GC-MS and/or volatile phenol glycoconjugates by LC-MS; bound volatile phenols can also be measured by GC-MS following acid hydrolysis of juice or wine [ 40 , 51 , 53 ]. Where industry relies on commercial laboratories for compositional analysis, this can be costly, and is therefore, not readily accessible to every vineyard or winery [ 50 , 69 ]. These methods also rely on existing smoke taint marker compounds, but there is some doubt as to whether all of the compounds responsible for smoke taint have actually been identified [ 33 , 34 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 An optimized GC-MS/MS method was eventually described to gather such data, 16 and recent publications have added further refinements. 15 , 17 Concurrent with these efforts was the approach to estimate total volatile phenols by subjecting samples to hydrolysis (acid or enzymatic) followed by GC-MS analysis. 14 , 18 Next-generation methods featured optimized hydrolyses via 1.0 N HCl and 1.25 N H 2 SO 4 , 17 or alternatively HCl at pH 1.5 over 4 h at 100 °C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 , 17 Concurrent with these efforts was the approach to estimate total volatile phenols by subjecting samples to hydrolysis (acid or enzymatic) followed by GC-MS analysis. 14 , 18 Next-generation methods featured optimized hydrolyses via 1.0 N HCl and 1.25 N H 2 SO 4 , 17 or alternatively HCl at pH 1.5 over 4 h at 100 °C. 16 The information provided by these two approaches, while useful, are of diminished value; the concentration levels of free volatile phenols are often very low, and data obtained for total volatile phenols involve indirect determinations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concentration level was low but comparable with the concentrations in the unsmoked wines. Liu et al [ 17 ] studied the recovery of a liquid-liquid extraction-based GC-MS/MS method for volatile phenol analysis in smoke-tainted grapes. They spiked a mixture of standards at a concentration of 100 ng/g, which is 20 times what we added.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%