2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2013.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for calculating in situ floc settling velocities based on effective density functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The settling velocity can then be derived if the relationship between effective density and floc size is established. This has been done, e.g., by assuming a self‐similarity between primary particles and flocs based on fractal theory [ Kranenburg , ; Winterwerp , ] or by using density functions that describe the mass distribution over the PSD [ Markussen and Andersen , ]. The settling velocity was calculated for each of the four aggregate groups of primary particles, flocculi, microflocs, and macroflocs separately, using the modified Stokes' equation [ Lee et al ., ]: ws,i=ρpρw18 μg Dp3nfiDinfi11+0.15Rei0.687 where w s , i is the settling velocity of the i th aggregate group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The settling velocity can then be derived if the relationship between effective density and floc size is established. This has been done, e.g., by assuming a self‐similarity between primary particles and flocs based on fractal theory [ Kranenburg , ; Winterwerp , ] or by using density functions that describe the mass distribution over the PSD [ Markussen and Andersen , ]. The settling velocity was calculated for each of the four aggregate groups of primary particles, flocculi, microflocs, and macroflocs separately, using the modified Stokes' equation [ Lee et al ., ]: ws,i=ρpρw18 μg Dp3nfiDinfi11+0.15Rei0.687 where w s , i is the settling velocity of the i th aggregate group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FV directly determines the vertical distribution of suspended sediment concentration (SSC) and near-bed deposition flux, and its accurate determination has been regarded as a priority in characterizing fine sediment transport. In the past, extensive efforts, e.g., (Fennessy et al, 1994;Gratiot et al, 2005;Krishnappan et al, 2004;Markussen and Andersen, 2013;McLaughlin, 1961;Mehta, 1989;Owen, 1971;Rouse, 1938;van Leussen, 2011), have been made to enhance our understanding of the physical process of fine sediment settling and a number of empirical and semi-empirical formulas for FV have been proposed in various forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another insurmountable problem preventing in situ FV measurement is that this method cannot distinguish individual flocs under high SSC condition. Even slight increases in SSC can cause single flocs to become entirely indistinguishable, meaning that the method is only valid for relatively low SSC (Markussen and Andersen, 2013). (3) The use of laboratory experiment (by settling column) for measuring the FV has a long history (Camp, 1936;Fathi-Moghadam et al, 2011;McLaughlin, 1961;van Leussen, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser in situ scattering and transmissometry (LISST) has been widely used to measure PSD in marine sediments, phytoplankton community and other natural particle assemblages, providing high-frequency and continuous PSD results (Czuba et al, 2015;Fettweis et al, 2014;Markussen and Andersen, 2013;Renosh et al, 2014;Reynolds et al, 2010;Xi et al, 2015). LISST greatly improves our understanding of PSD in seawater, but the SPM composition remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%