1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-4018(97)00234-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method for the in situ analysis of femtosecond UV pulses in the pump-probe spectroscopy of solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross section is approximately three to five times larger for the parallel spectrum and four to seven times larger for the perpendicular spectrum when they are obtained with the higher energy pump photons. The absolute cross sections that we measure are about an order of magnitude larger than the values from the gas-phase calculation and slightly larger than those of Nikogosyan et al, 42,51 but they are within the range of values measured more recently with femtosecond laser pulses at 8.5, 44 8.8, 43 9.3, 45 and 9.4 eV. 46 The monotonic rise of the absorption up to 9.5 eV is qualitatively consistent with previous experimental results 28,42 and theoretical calculations, 39 but the actual shape of our perpendicularly polarized spectrum is slightly different from the one obtained by Thomsen et al 28 Their spectrum rises more rapidly from 8.5 to 9.5 eV, and peaks at a slightly higher energy.…”
Section: B Experimental Two-photon Absorption Spectrum and Polarizatsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cross section is approximately three to five times larger for the parallel spectrum and four to seven times larger for the perpendicular spectrum when they are obtained with the higher energy pump photons. The absolute cross sections that we measure are about an order of magnitude larger than the values from the gas-phase calculation and slightly larger than those of Nikogosyan et al, 42,51 but they are within the range of values measured more recently with femtosecond laser pulses at 8.5, 44 8.8, 43 9.3, 45 and 9.4 eV. 46 The monotonic rise of the absorption up to 9.5 eV is qualitatively consistent with previous experimental results 28,42 and theoretical calculations, 39 but the actual shape of our perpendicularly polarized spectrum is slightly different from the one obtained by Thomsen et al 28 Their spectrum rises more rapidly from 8.5 to 9.5 eV, and peaks at a slightly higher energy.…”
Section: B Experimental Two-photon Absorption Spectrum and Polarizatsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Absolute 2PA cross sections have been reported at a limited number of discrete energies. [42][43][44][45][46] Most notably, Nikogosyan et al 42 observed a monotonic rise of the cross section for degenerate two-photon excitation with a picosecond laser at five energies ranging from 7.8 to 9.3 eV. The increasing 2PA across that range strongly contrasts with the distinct absorption band at 8.3 eV in the 1PA spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most likely contribution is two-photon absorption as reported by Laubereau; however, the intensity of this absorption should reflect the two-photon spectrum and thus the spike height at 800 nm should be extremely weak. 57 Looking at pure water, the transient signal around time zero scaled linearly with pump power. The intensity of the transient is reduced with the pump and probe perpendicularly polarized, but its presence stills leads to some uncertainty in fitting a rise to the electron appearance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All A signals were corrected for the group velocity dispersion of the probe light with the 25 fs accuracy, utilizing the position of the instrument response functions (IRF), namely, Gaussian-shaped A signals observed in neat solvents as a result of the simultaneous absorption of a pump and a probe photon when the pump and probe pulses temporally overlap. 73,74 The IRF width (fwhm) increases with an increase in probe photon energy from 139 fs in the visible range to 148 fs at 380 nm, 221 fs at 280 nm, and 387 fs at 214 nm in methylcyclohexane. In acetonitrile, the IRF widths were smaller by a factor of 1.26 at wavelengths shorter than 380 nm.…”
Section: B Ultrafast Transient Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%