2011
DOI: 10.1186/2191-0855-1-21
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple method to evaluate the number of bradyrhizobia on soybean seeds and its implication on inoculant quality control

Abstract: Soybean seeds are non-sterile and their bacterial population interferes with the enumeration of beneficial bacteria, making it difficult to assess survival under different conditions. Within this context, the principal aims of this work were: (1) to improve a selective media for the enumeration of B. japonicum recovered from inoculated soybean seeds; (2) to establish the most representative mathematical function for B. japonicum mortality on soybean seeds after inoculation; (3) to evaluate if environmental or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 100% RH, the number of CFU was not affected negatively in sand nor on filters, however, when placed on sterile alfalfa seeds, CFU did decline to 0.27%. This can be explained by a toxic effect of the seed-surface, which has been described previously (Salema et al 1982 Death of rhizobia on inoculated seed, Smith 1992, Vriezen et al 2006, Penna et al 2011). We chose to further explore the responses of S. meliloti 1021 to desiccation using nitrocellulose filters, since the error on filter is lower compared to the use of a sand matrix, and no negative matrix effect is seen similar to drying on alfalfa seeds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…At 100% RH, the number of CFU was not affected negatively in sand nor on filters, however, when placed on sterile alfalfa seeds, CFU did decline to 0.27%. This can be explained by a toxic effect of the seed-surface, which has been described previously (Salema et al 1982 Death of rhizobia on inoculated seed, Smith 1992, Vriezen et al 2006, Penna et al 2011). We chose to further explore the responses of S. meliloti 1021 to desiccation using nitrocellulose filters, since the error on filter is lower compared to the use of a sand matrix, and no negative matrix effect is seen similar to drying on alfalfa seeds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Following the current methodology used in South America for cellular recovery of Bradyrhizobium spp. from soybean seeds [26][27][28][29] , A. brasilense strains Ab-V5 and Ab-V6 were single inoculated into maize seeds and submitted to the cell recovery process. Zero or near to zero cells were recovered, being classified in the category of "very low" (Table 1), highlighting that the methodology was not suitable to evaluate the recovery of viable cells of A. brasilense from inoculated maize seeds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these results, the following conditions were chosen for A. brasilense recovery: seeds previously hydrated in distilled sterile water for 2 h, inoculum diluted in distilled sterile water prior to seed inoculation (1:2, v:v), recovery step to the dilution 10 0 in water with Tween 80 (0.4 mL L -1 ), and shaking for 30 min. The subsequent steps, to obtain the following dilutions (10 -1 , 10 -2 , 10 -3 and 10 -4 ), plating of the samples and counting of CFU followed the current methodology for recovery of Bradyrhizobium from soybean seeds [26][27][28][29] . The steps can be visualized in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recovery of viable Bradyrhizobium cells from inoculated seeds and counting followed the methodology previously described (Araujo et al, 2017;Penna, Massa, Olivieri, Gutkimd, & Cassán, 2011;Santos et al, 2020), also included in the Brazilian legislation (Mapa, 2010). Five treatments were evaluated, and they are described in detail in the item of field experiments.…”
Section: Concentration Purity and Strain Identity In The Inoculant mentioning
confidence: 99%