2018
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple, rapid method for detecting seven common invasive fish species in Europe from environmental DNA

Abstract: 1. Biological invasions are a global threat to biodiversity, and many arise from deliberate introductions.2. The American freshwater fish Micropterus salmoides and Ameiurus spp. (Ameiurus melas and Ameiurus nebulosus) were introduced to Europe for recreational fishing, Gambusia holbrooki and Gambusia affinis were introduced for mosquito population control, and Lepomis gibbosus was introduced as an ornamental species. The Asiatic Pseudorasbora parva was acquired inadvertently as an accompanying species in fish … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as this is a non‐lethal method, it would be suitable for monitoring populations of endangered anguillid eels in the same way as it has been applied to other endangered species, including fishes (Boothroyd, Mandrak, Fox, & Wilson, ; Eva et al, ; Laramie, Pilliod, & Goldberg, ; Pfleger, Rider, Johnston, & Janosik, ), bivalves (Currier, Morris, Wilson, & Freeland, ), and amphibians (Fukumoto et al, ). This method could also be used to monitor species of invasive eels, as it has been used for other invasive species (Clusa & García‐Vázquez, ; Dougherty et al, ; Hinlo, Furlan, Suitor, & Gleeson, ). Non‐native eel species (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as this is a non‐lethal method, it would be suitable for monitoring populations of endangered anguillid eels in the same way as it has been applied to other endangered species, including fishes (Boothroyd, Mandrak, Fox, & Wilson, ; Eva et al, ; Laramie, Pilliod, & Goldberg, ; Pfleger, Rider, Johnston, & Janosik, ), bivalves (Currier, Morris, Wilson, & Freeland, ), and amphibians (Fukumoto et al, ). This method could also be used to monitor species of invasive eels, as it has been used for other invasive species (Clusa & García‐Vázquez, ; Dougherty et al, ; Hinlo, Furlan, Suitor, & Gleeson, ). Non‐native eel species (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, sampling was performed at the shore of the river and the lake around 1-m depth. The sampling strategy was the same as that used in Ebro River (Clusa and Garcia-Vazquez 2018), which, like the Rhine River, is a big river with high flow and rapid current speed. Indeed, it is possible that the DNA of some species, especially for those fish swimming far from the shore, was at very low concentration and remained undetected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often difficult to pinpoint the exact location of an invasion front because individuals at the invasion front are present at low-density and are therefore difficult to detect. In recent years environmental DNA (eDNA) has started to be used as an AIS monitoring tool due to its high sensitivity, non-invasive sampling, and cost effectiveness (Herder et al, 2014;Clusa and García-Vázquez, 2018;Geerts et al, 2018). The method is based on the detection of species from extracellular DNA, or cell debris, that species leave behind in the environment (Valentini et al, 2009).…”
Section: Important Considerations In the Application Of Ais Exclusion Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%