1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb00931.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Scoring System for Clock Drawing in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were asked to draw the entire face of a clock depicting the time “10 after 11” using standard instructions where the administrator did not repeat the directions. The clock drawing test was scored using a five item procedure demonstrated reliable and valid by Shua-Haim et al (34). The participant received a score of 1 if their representation fit the description of the item, or 0 if not.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were asked to draw the entire face of a clock depicting the time “10 after 11” using standard instructions where the administrator did not repeat the directions. The clock drawing test was scored using a five item procedure demonstrated reliable and valid by Shua-Haim et al (34). The participant received a score of 1 if their representation fit the description of the item, or 0 if not.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Correlating highly with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) 15,16 and other measures of global cognitive decline, the CDT serves as a simple and nonthreatening cognitive screen, rendering it a popular tool in both clinical and research practices. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Correlating highly with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) 15,16 and other measures of global cognitive decline, the CDT serves as a simple and nonthreatening cognitive screen, rendering it a popular tool in both clinical and research practices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manos y col. 13 , empleando la misma técnica, encontraron que la prueba del reloj tenía una sensibilidad de 80% y una sensibilidad de 77%; sin embargo, el estudio incluyó solo pacientes con enfermedad de Alzheimer con demencia leve y con MMSE mayor de 23. La prueba del reloj, en general, con sus múltiples variantes en cuanto a su puntuación, ha sido reportado de tener un rango de sensibilidad de 48 a 94% y especificidad de 42 a 97% ( [17][18][19] ). Existen varias razones para la gran variabilidad en la sensibilidad y especificidad de la prueba del reloj; una de las principales es que existen varios sistemas de puntuación y cada uno de ellos varía en complejidad.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified