2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3ay40333e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple square wave voltammetric method for the determination of aclonifen herbicide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The square wave voltammetric method for the determination of aclonifen herbicide showed an oxidation peak at +1175 mV on the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) in a pH 4 B-R buffer solution. 40 Aclonifene was taken at the same concentration as phenmedipham (1 mg/L) and the relative error in recovery of phenmedipham was +4.3%. If the aclonifen concentration exceeded the phenmedipham concentration by 5-or 10-fold, the relative error in the phenmedipham assay was below the 5% tolerance limit.…”
Section: Methods Selectivity and Interference Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The square wave voltammetric method for the determination of aclonifen herbicide showed an oxidation peak at +1175 mV on the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) in a pH 4 B-R buffer solution. 40 Aclonifene was taken at the same concentration as phenmedipham (1 mg/L) and the relative error in recovery of phenmedipham was +4.3%. If the aclonifen concentration exceeded the phenmedipham concentration by 5-or 10-fold, the relative error in the phenmedipham assay was below the 5% tolerance limit.…”
Section: Methods Selectivity and Interference Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LOD and limit of quantification (LOQ) values were obtained as 0.16 μM and 0.55 μM, respectively. LOD and LOQ values were calculated using the following equations [ 24 , 25 ]: LOD = 3 Sb / m , LOQ = 10 Sb / m , where Sb is the standard deviation of the fortified blank solution containing 10 μM CA (10 runs) and m is the slope of the calibration curve. The high values of the slope (3 × 10 −3 μA/μM) and correlation coefficient ( R 2 = 0.994) reflected the sensitivity of the proposed method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is possible due to the increased mechanical stability of m-AgSAE compared to traditional electrodes utilizing liquid mercury. Due to the use of m-AgSAE this method is more sensitive than comparable methods using f-AgSAE [22] and BDDE [24] and the electrode is less prone to passivation and easier to maintain. This is even more true when compared to the more sensitive but much more complex electrochemical nanobiosensors [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More direct approach using silver amalgam based electrodes is also a recurring theme in the contemporary literature [18][19][20][21][22], all the works use a mercury film modified AgSAE for some reason, which uses small amounts of mercury for film renewal, but the mercury has to be in a toxic water soluble form, the film is much less stable than a meniscus and the electrode needs to be polished much more often, which is time consuming. Some works focus on the determination of herbicides at classical mercury electrodes [23] this method utilizes the excellent reproducibility of a hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE) to deconvolute the signals of three herbicides to determine them in a mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%