1995
DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00062-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple visual assessment technique to discriminate between menorrhagia and normal menstrual blood loss

Abstract: We validated and refined a new, simple, visual assessment technique and demonstrated that it is superior to a woman's subjective assessment of menstrual blood loss and the occurrence of anemia for predicting menorrhagia, even if it is performed only once. We also demonstrated that the volume that clots contribute to menstruation is not as large as many clinicians believe. With this technique, the quality of therapy can be enhanced by making it more adequate and rational.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is common in premenopausal women. Patients with menstrual bleeding greater than 80 mL are likely to be anemic; however, even if the hemoglobin level is within the normal range, menorrhagia cannot be excluded (sensitivity 43%, specificity 94%) [2]. Menorrhagia primarily occurs due to an intracavitary abnormality, but may also occur without such abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common in premenopausal women. Patients with menstrual bleeding greater than 80 mL are likely to be anemic; however, even if the hemoglobin level is within the normal range, menorrhagia cannot be excluded (sensitivity 43%, specificity 94%) [2]. Menorrhagia primarily occurs due to an intracavitary abnormality, but may also occur without such abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bleeding score was calculated according to the ISTH bleeding assessment tool (ISTH‐BAT) 3. His 30‐year‐old mother had epistaxis, easy bruising, gum bleeding, and abnormal menstrual score according to the Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Chart4 (PBAC = 192, nv < 185). His 40‐year‐old father and his sister did not show bleeding symptoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Menorrhagia was diagnosed based on the patient’s history and amount of menstrual bleeding while the number of used pads per day by the patient was measured based on bleeding scores (29). Inclusion criteria were defined as having bleeding that lasted for more than seven days or resulted in a loss of more than 80 mL of blood per menstrual cycle, being an adolescent with menorrhagia, adult female with menorrhagia without any other cause or female undergoing a hysterectomy for menorrhagia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%