1973
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1973.10469784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Technique Used to Evaluate Atmospheric Dispersion of Emissions from Large Power Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no one has carried out the process following the MPTER algorithm. Gifford [3] developed an alignment chart or nomograph for similar calculations, and Montgomery et al [4] prepared a modified version applicable to emissions from large power plants. The nomographs in these papers were drawn to estimate plume rise and effective emission height from one plot, and then concentration from another.…”
Section: Review Of Earlier Work On Maximum Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no one has carried out the process following the MPTER algorithm. Gifford [3] developed an alignment chart or nomograph for similar calculations, and Montgomery et al [4] prepared a modified version applicable to emissions from large power plants. The nomographs in these papers were drawn to estimate plume rise and effective emission height from one plot, and then concentration from another.…”
Section: Review Of Earlier Work On Maximum Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equations of the turbulent kinetic energy (k) and of the dissipation rate of the kinetic energy () associated with the second-order model are defined as follows: (6) (7) with (8) (9) (10) For more information concerning the constants introduced in the different equations see reference [14].…”
Section: Computational Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was then upgraded to cover stacks of different elevations and validated with reference to experimental data. The model was finally corrected, in terms of ground level concentrations, with reference to the empirical expression of Montgomery et al [6] together with Briggs' models [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He showed that if one assumes emissions are uniformly distributed over a region, then average pollutant concentrations can be predicted from emission/ concentration ratios derived from historic mixing height and wind speed data. There has been other work on simplified air pollution meteorological analysis including the urban models of Hanna 7 and Martin, 8 and the simplified power plant analysis techniques of Montgomery et al 9 Another approach has been to examine "worst-case" meteorology-identify atmospheric conditions which will be associated with maxi-mum concentrations. By assuming atmospheric stagnation as a worst-case, Hinman and Leonard 10 were able to derive concentration/emission ratios which are independent of source location.…”
Section: Pollution Possibility Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, using a detailed meteorological model, 9 second-highest peak 3-hour concentrations were determined at key receptors for each of these configurations. For each configuration /, we have a vector of three emission levels from the three source categories defined above, £;.…”
Section: A Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%