2005
DOI: 10.1080/03081060500120324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simulation Framework for Evaluating Airline Temporary Schedule Adjustments Following Incidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, there were several simulation studies analyzing the problems related specifically to air transportation infrastructure, operations and airports. Some topics that were evaluated in these studies were the improvement of airline schedules (Yan et al , 2005), conflicting ground movements (Pitfield et al , 1998), airport capacity estimation (Pitfield and Jerrard, 1999), management of the runway and taxiways (Ottman et al , 1999), construction of a new terminal building (Kiran et al , 2000), air traffic control (Callantine et al , 2001), airport gate planning (Hamzawi, 1986; Yan et al , 2002), airport road network, transportation modes to airports and parking (Psaraki and Abacoumkin, 2002), modeling the flow of passengers in airport terminals (Gatersleben and Van der Weij, 1999; Takakuwa and Oyama, 2003), air cargo operations (Nsakanda et al , 2004), contingency planning for aircraft turnaround operations (Adeleye and Chung, 2006), airport luggage retrieval (Rijsenbrij and Ottjes, 2007), aircraft operations (Mott et al , 2016) and airline operations control (Bouarfa et al , 2016). Zhang et al (2016) studied topological properties of the Chinese airline network and air route connections influence on it.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there were several simulation studies analyzing the problems related specifically to air transportation infrastructure, operations and airports. Some topics that were evaluated in these studies were the improvement of airline schedules (Yan et al , 2005), conflicting ground movements (Pitfield et al , 1998), airport capacity estimation (Pitfield and Jerrard, 1999), management of the runway and taxiways (Ottman et al , 1999), construction of a new terminal building (Kiran et al , 2000), air traffic control (Callantine et al , 2001), airport gate planning (Hamzawi, 1986; Yan et al , 2002), airport road network, transportation modes to airports and parking (Psaraki and Abacoumkin, 2002), modeling the flow of passengers in airport terminals (Gatersleben and Van der Weij, 1999; Takakuwa and Oyama, 2003), air cargo operations (Nsakanda et al , 2004), contingency planning for aircraft turnaround operations (Adeleye and Chung, 2006), airport luggage retrieval (Rijsenbrij and Ottjes, 2007), aircraft operations (Mott et al , 2016) and airline operations control (Bouarfa et al , 2016). Zhang et al (2016) studied topological properties of the Chinese airline network and air route connections influence on it.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To produce the recovery plan and solve the disruption problem, a connection network [3]- [7], a time-line network [8]- [11], a time-band network [12]- [14] and an inequality-based multi-objective genetic algorithm [2] are proposed respectively in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on recovery scheduling has focused on enhancing static recovery scheduling models, while none has analyzed these factors from a systems perspective. Yan et al (2005) proposed a framework embodying a simulation process. Their framework not only analyzes the effect of stochastic flight delays on static recovery scheduling, but also designs more effective flexible buffer times and real-time schedule recovery rules.…”
Section: Airline Schedule Disruption Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%