1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(99)00033-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation model for studying the role of pre-slaughter factors on the exposure of beef carcasses to human microbial hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most human infections are acquired from the consumption of foods and water contaminated directly or indirectly with bovine fecal material (2). Hence, lowering the amount of E. coli O157 excreted in the feces of individual cattle and minimizing the number of cattle excreting E. coli O157 are predicted to significantly reduce the incidence of human E. coli O157-related diseases (6,17,18,20). Unfortunately, methods to effectively control E. coli O157 in cattle have yet to be identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most human infections are acquired from the consumption of foods and water contaminated directly or indirectly with bovine fecal material (2). Hence, lowering the amount of E. coli O157 excreted in the feces of individual cattle and minimizing the number of cattle excreting E. coli O157 are predicted to significantly reduce the incidence of human E. coli O157-related diseases (6,17,18,20). Unfortunately, methods to effectively control E. coli O157 in cattle have yet to be identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already discussed in this article, according to Arthur et al (3) and Woener et al 2, pens with >20% fecal prevalence contribute significantly to hide and carcass contamination. In turn, hide and carcass contamination can compromise apparent vaccine efficacy due to crosscontamination of hides during transport to harvest (38) or cross-contamination of carcasses during processing (39). On the basis of a postulated threshold effect involving vaccine-induced reductions in shedding density (reductions in the numbers of animals with fecal shedding exceeding 10 3 CFU/g E. coli O157, also known as super-shedders), Matthews et al recently proposed that cattle vaccination would in fact produce substantially greater reductions in human disease caused by E. coli O157 than predicted based solely on effects on cattle shedding prevalence (40).…”
Section: Efficacy Of Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control and/or reduction methods have included herd vaccinations, reducing visible feces via cleaning or sanitizing steps prior to slaughter, fasting prior to slaughter, changing the order of cattle introduced into processing based on visual inspection, and identifying and reducing cross‐contamination from the farm to slaughter plant. Vaccination has been recommended as the most viable treatment for reduction in overall prevalence (Jordan and others 1999b; Wood and others 2006). However, concerns over possible disturbance of commensal microflora and pathogen resistance are mentioned as current hindrances to vaccination strategies (Wood and others 2006).…”
Section: Live Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An initial prevalence of 9.1% for incoming cattle increased to 39.4% and 54.5% in the presale and postsale pen areas (Collis and others 2004). Jordan and others (1999b) outlined a model that considered many variables for characterizing infection and possible cross‐contamination of incoming cattle.…”
Section: Live Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation