2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single energy-based parameter to assess protection capability of debris shields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SPH method used for the numerical analysis is a two-dimensional analysis method. The simulation conditions were elaborately explained in the research paper written by Sekine et al 14) Figure 10 shows the configuration of the debris hypervelocity impact phenomenon. As shown in this figure, the position of 0 x  was defined as the point that was orthogonally projected on the surface of the pressure wall.…”
Section: Kinetic Energy Analysis Of Debris Cloud Using the Sph Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The SPH method used for the numerical analysis is a two-dimensional analysis method. The simulation conditions were elaborately explained in the research paper written by Sekine et al 14) Figure 10 shows the configuration of the debris hypervelocity impact phenomenon. As shown in this figure, the position of 0 x  was defined as the point that was orthogonally projected on the surface of the pressure wall.…”
Section: Kinetic Energy Analysis Of Debris Cloud Using the Sph Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10,14) Although previous experimental studies, 12,13) have investigated the damage of debris clouds on pressure walls in the impact experiments, they focused on the derivation of empirical equations based on numerous experimental results. Their investigations did not reveal the mechanism that describes how the debris cloud creates the penetration hole of the pressure wall.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations