2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.06301
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single-qubit position verification protocol that is secure against multi-qubit attacks

Andreas Bluhm,
Matthias Christandl,
Florian Speelman

Abstract: While it is known that unconditionally secure position-based cryptography is impossible both in the classical and the quantum setting, it has been shown that some quantum protocols for position verification are secure against attackers which share a quantum state of bounded dimension. In this work, we consider the security of the qubit routing protocol. The protocol has the advantage that an honest prover only has to manipulate a single qubit and a classical string of length 2n. We show that the protocol is se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work we gave the first lower bound on entanglement from complexity. Qualitatively, this is different from existing bounds, which are either for specific tasks [18,42] or specific families of tasks [43]. While it is interesting a lower bound of this type exists, the bound we have given is much weaker than suggested by our 'strong' complexity-entanglement conjecture.…”
Section: Improved Lower Bounds On Entanglementcontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this work we gave the first lower bound on entanglement from complexity. Qualitatively, this is different from existing bounds, which are either for specific tasks [18,42] or specific families of tasks [43]. While it is interesting a lower bound of this type exists, the bound we have given is much weaker than suggested by our 'strong' complexity-entanglement conjecture.…”
Section: Improved Lower Bounds On Entanglementcontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Assuming classical computation is easy and storing (even polynomial) entanglement is hard then still leads to a gap between the difficulty of honest and dishonest strategies. For work in this direction see [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All previous protocols in the standard model (as opposed to the QROM) are not known to be secure even against an arbitrary polynomial amount of entanglement, and any protocol can be broken with an exponential amount of entanglement [BCF + 14, BK11]. Furthermore, the position verification protocols that are secure against any polynomial amount of entanglement are all proven in the QROM, either explicitly [Unr14] or implicitly via considering a random function in the security proof [BCS21].…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%