16th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icact.2014.6779152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A smart vertical handoff decision algorithm based on queuing theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hysteresis-based and dwelling time-based are evaluated the vertical handover approach [2] but these method rely on sampling and averaging RSS points, which introduces increased handover delay. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was proposed by [3][4]; the network with the highest performance score is selected on target network but this method ignores the wireless environment. Finally, Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) approach is the combination of methods and uses the many parameters at the same time (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hysteresis-based and dwelling time-based are evaluated the vertical handover approach [2] but these method rely on sampling and averaging RSS points, which introduces increased handover delay. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was proposed by [3][4]; the network with the highest performance score is selected on target network but this method ignores the wireless environment. Finally, Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) approach is the combination of methods and uses the many parameters at the same time (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing network selection algorithms main ly consist of game theory [5][6], genetic algorith m [7], mu lti-attribute decision making (MADM) [8], fuzzy logic [9], the utility function [10] and other methods and models [11], In [6], the author proposed a cost-effective network selection algorithm aimed at to maximize user's profit, explained the relationship between operators and users with non -cooperative game in the abstract, chose the best network by seeking a Nash equilibriu m. The authors in [9] adopted the received signal strength, available bandwidth, price and user's preference as network selection index, used fuzzy logic to calculate candidate network performance and execute the best network selection. The network selecting algorithm of the authors in [12] comb ined with AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and SAW (simple add weight) to perform network selection, namely used AHP computing network selection decision attribute weights, reused SAW sorting the candidate network, and then selected the best network, the authors in [13] through calculating the network performance parameters and traffic blocking probability, selected and assessed network with user's satisfaction dynamically. The authors in [14][15] based on AHP and TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution), used AHP computing the relative importance of network selection decision attribute, reused TOPSIS executing the best network selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%